Skip to content

Keycloak DoS via account lockout

Low severity GitHub Reviewed Published Feb 29, 2024 to the GitHub Advisory Database • Updated Jun 11, 2024

Package

maven org.keycloak:keycloak-core (Maven)

Affected versions

<= 23.0.5

Patched versions

24.0.0

Description

A flaw was found in Keycloak. In certain conditions, this issue may allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to block other accounts from logging in.

References

Published by the National Vulnerability Database Feb 29, 2024
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Feb 29, 2024
Reviewed Feb 29, 2024
Last updated Jun 11, 2024

Severity

Low

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
None
Availability
Low

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L

EPSS score

0.043%
(10th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2024-1722

GHSA ID

GHSA-3hrr-xwvg-hxvr

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.