Skip to content

Rancher cattle-token is predictable

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Jan 25, 2023 in rancher/rancher • Updated Feb 7, 2023

Package

gomod github.com/rancher/rancher (Go)

Affected versions

>= 2.6.0, < 2.6.10
>= 2.7.0, < 2.7.1

Patched versions

2.6.10
2.7.1

Description

Impact

An issue was discovered in Rancher versions up to and including 2.6.9 and 2.7.0, where the cattle-token secret, used by the cattle-cluster-agent, is predictable. Even after the token is regenerated, it will have the same value. This issue is not present in Rancher 2.5 releases.

The cattle-token is used by Rancher's cattle-cluster-agent to connect to the Kubernetes API of Rancher provisioned downstream clusters. The problem occurs because the cattle-token secret does not use any random value in its composition, which causes it to always be regenerated with the same value. This can pose a serious problem if the token is compromised and needs to be recreated for security purposes.

The usage of the cattle-token by an unauthorized user allows to escalate privileges to the cluster owner of the affected downstream cluster. It does not allow access to Rancher's own local cluster (the cluster where Rancher is provisioned).

Workarounds

In case it is not possible to promptly update to a patched version, a workaround is to use the rotate script provided in the public security advisory CVE-2021-36782 / GHSA-g7j7-h4q8-8w2f, which facilitates the rotation and creation of a new unique downstream cluster token.

Patches

Patched versions include releases 2.6.10, 2.7.1 and later versions.

After upgrading to one of the patched versions, it is highly recommended to rotate the cattle-token in downstream clusters to guarantee that a new random token will be safely regenerated.

The procedure below can rotate the cattle-token and should be executed in each downstream cluster provisioned by Rancher. It is recommended to first test this process in an appropriate development/testing environment.

# Verify the current secret before rotating it
$ kubectl describe secrets cattle-token -n cattle-system

# Delete the secret
$ kubectl delete secrets cattle-token -n cattle-system

# Restart the cattle-cluster-agent deployment
$ kubectl rollout restart deployment/cattle-cluster-agent -n cattle-system

# Confirm that a new and different secret was generated
$ kubectl describe secrets cattle-token -n cattle-system

For more information

If you have any questions or comments about this advisory:

References

@macedogm macedogm published to rancher/rancher Jan 25, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Jan 25, 2023
Reviewed Jan 25, 2023
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Feb 7, 2023
Last updated Feb 7, 2023

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
Low
Availability
High

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:H

EPSS score

0.168%
(55th percentile)

CVE ID

CVE-2022-43755

GHSA ID

GHSA-8c69-r38j-rpfj

Source code

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.