Skip to content

On a compromised node, the virt-handler service account can be used to modify all node specs

High severity GitHub Reviewed Published Mar 15, 2023 in kubevirt/kubevirt • Updated Mar 27, 2023

Package

gomod kubevirt.io/kubevirt (Go)

Affected versions

<= 0.59.0

Patched versions

None

Description

Impact

If a malicious user has taken over a Kubernetes node where virt-handler (the KubeVirt node-daemon) is running, the virt-handler service account can be used to modify all node specs.

This can be misused to lure-in system-level-privileged components (which can for instance read all secrets on the cluster, or can exec into pods on other nodes). This way a compromised node can be used to elevate privileges beyond the node until potentially having full privileged access to the whole cluster.

The simplest way to exploit this, once a user could compromise a specific node, is to set with the virt-handler service account all other nodes to unschedulable and simply wait until system-critical components with high privileges appear on its node.

Since this requires a node to be compromised first, the severity of this finding is considered Medium.

Patches

Not yet available.

Workarounds

Gatekeeper users can add a webhook which will block the virt-handler service account to modify the spec of a node.

An example policy, preventing virt-handler from changing the node spec may look like this:

apiVersion: templates.gatekeeper.sh/v1
kind: ConstraintTemplate
metadata:
  name: virthandlerrestrictions
spec:
[...]
  targets:
    - libs:
        - |         
[...]          
          is_virt_handler(username) {
              username == "system:serviceaccount:kubevirt:virt-handler"
          }
          mutates_node_in_unintended_way {
            # TODO
            # only allow kubevirt.io/ prefixed metadata node changes
          }
      rego: |
[...]
        
        violation[{"msg": msg}] {
          is_virt_handler(username)
          mutates_node_in_unintended_way(input.review.object, input.review.oldObject)
          msg := sprintf("virt-handler tries to modify node <%v> in an unintended way.", [input.review.object.name])
        }

and applying this template to node modifications.

Credits

Special thanks to the discoverers of this issue:

Nanzi Yang (nzyang@stu.xidian.edu.cn)
Xin Guo (guox@stu.xidian.edu.cn)
Jietao Xiao (jietaoXiao@stu.xidian.edu.cn)
Wenbo Shen (shenwenbo@zju.edu.cn)
Jinku Li (jkli@xidian.edu.cn)

References

kubevirt/kubevirt#9109

References

@rmohr rmohr published to kubevirt/kubevirt Mar 15, 2023
Published by the National Vulnerability Database Mar 15, 2023
Published to the GitHub Advisory Database Mar 16, 2023
Reviewed Mar 16, 2023
Last updated Mar 27, 2023

Severity

High

CVSS overall score

This score calculates overall vulnerability severity from 0 to 10 and is based on the Common Vulnerability Scoring System (CVSS).
/ 10

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector
Network
Attack complexity
High
Privileges required
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS v3 base metrics

Attack vector: More severe the more the remote (logically and physically) an attacker can be in order to exploit the vulnerability.
Attack complexity: More severe for the least complex attacks.
Privileges required: More severe if no privileges are required.
User interaction: More severe when no user interaction is required.
Scope: More severe when a scope change occurs, e.g. one vulnerable component impacts resources in components beyond its security scope.
Confidentiality: More severe when loss of data confidentiality is highest, measuring the level of data access available to an unauthorized user.
Integrity: More severe when loss of data integrity is the highest, measuring the consequence of data modification possible by an unauthorized user.
Availability: More severe when the loss of impacted component availability is highest.
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N

EPSS score

0.065%
(30th percentile)

Weaknesses

CVE ID

CVE-2023-26484

GHSA ID

GHSA-cp96-jpmq-xrr2

Source code

Credits

Loading Checking history
See something to contribute? Suggest improvements for this vulnerability.