Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: [CL-009] address allowlist can be set independently of spend limits #280

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

howydev
Copy link
Collaborator

@howydev howydev commented Nov 8, 2024

No description provided.

@howydev howydev marked this pull request as ready for review November 8, 2024 19:15
Copy link

octane-security-app-dev bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Summary by Octane

New Contracts

No new contracts were added in this PR.

Updated Contracts

  • AllowlistModule.sol: The smart contract now includes an ERC20 spend limit feature in the address allowlist functionality.

🔗 Commit Hash: 29cb64f

Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Contract sizes:

 | Contract                      | Runtime Size (B) | Initcode Size (B) | Runtime Margin (B) | Initcode Margin (B) |
 |-------------------------------|------------------|-------------------|--------------------|---------------------|
 | AccountFactory                |            4,814 |             5,239 |             19,762 |              43,913 |
-| AllowlistModule               |            9,903 |             9,930 |             14,673 |              39,222 |
+| AllowlistModule               |            9,553 |             9,580 |             15,023 |              39,572 |
 | ExecutionInstallDelegate      |            5,694 |             5,740 |             18,882 |              43,412 |
 | ModularAccount                |           21,971 |            28,654 |              2,605 |              20,498 |
 | NativeFunctionDelegate        |              434 |               461 |             24,142 |              48,691 |
 | NativeTokenLimitModule        |            4,258 |             4,285 |             20,318 |              44,867 |
 | PaymasterGuardModule          |            1,797 |             1,824 |             22,779 |              47,328 |
 | SemiModularAccountBytecode    |           23,273 |            29,956 |              1,303 |              19,196 |
 | SemiModularAccountStorageOnly |           23,767 |            30,450 |                809 |              18,702 |
 | SingleSignerValidationModule  |            3,646 |             3,673 |             20,930 |              45,479 |
 | TimeRangeModule               |            2,000 |             2,027 |             22,576 |              47,125 |
 | WebAuthnValidationModule      |            7,854 |             7,881 |             16,722 |              41,271 |

Code coverage:

File % Lines % Statements % Branches % Funcs
src/account/AccountBase.sol 100.00% (8/8) 100.00% (7/7) 100.00% (2/2) 100.00% (4/4)
src/account/AccountStorageInitializable.sol 100.00% (19/19) 100.00% (26/26) 100.00% (5/5) 100.00% (2/2)
src/account/ModularAccount.sol 100.00% (2/2) 100.00% (2/2) 100.00% (0/0) 100.00% (3/3)
src/account/ModularAccountBase.sol 98.99% (294/297) 96.29% (363/377) 77.59% (45/58) 100.00% (36/36)
src/account/ModularAccountView.sol 100.00% (24/24) 100.00% (28/28) 100.00% (2/2) 100.00% (4/4)
src/account/ModuleManagerInternals.sol 95.08% (58/61) 96.20% (76/79) 62.50% (5/8) 100.00% (3/3)
src/account/SemiModularAccountBase.sol 88.71% (55/62) 92.13% (82/89) 66.67% (10/15) 100.00% (16/16)
src/account/SemiModularAccountBytecode.sol 100.00% (6/6) 100.00% (7/7) 100.00% (1/1) 66.67% (2/3)
src/account/SemiModularAccountStorageOnly.sol 80.00% (4/5) 83.33% (5/6) 100.00% (0/0) 66.67% (2/3)
src/account/TokenReceiver.sol 33.33% (1/3) 33.33% (1/3) 100.00% (0/0) 33.33% (1/3)
src/factory/AccountFactory.sol 70.59% (24/34) 76.09% (35/46) 40.00% (2/5) 58.33% (7/12)
src/helpers/ExecutionInstallDelegate.sol 92.59% (50/54) 92.96% (66/71) 40.00% (2/5) 100.00% (7/7)
src/helpers/NativeFunctionDelegate.sol 100.00% (16/16) 100.00% (30/30) 100.00% (0/0) 100.00% (1/1)
src/libraries/ExecutionLib.sol 98.92% (274/277) 98.15% (266/271) 84.85% (28/33) 100.00% (24/24)
src/libraries/KnownSelectorsLib.sol 100.00% (15/15) 100.00% (32/32) 100.00% (0/0) 100.00% (2/2)
src/libraries/LinkedListSetLib.sol 94.00% (47/50) 96.25% (77/80) 66.67% (4/6) 100.00% (8/8)
src/libraries/MemManagementLib.sol 100.00% (54/54) 100.00% (70/70) 100.00% (0/0) 100.00% (12/12)
src/libraries/ModuleInstallCommonsLib.sol 57.14% (8/14) 42.11% (8/19) 75.00% (3/4) 100.00% (3/3)
src/modules/ModuleBase.sol 100.00% (13/13) 94.12% (16/17) 100.00% (2/2) 100.00% (3/3)
src/modules/permissions/AllowlistModule.sol 86.05% (74/86) 85.71% (96/112) 78.26% (18/23) 50.00% (9/18)
src/modules/permissions/NativeTokenLimitModule.sol 92.31% (36/39) 92.86% (52/56) 100.00% (9/9) 63.64% (7/11)
src/modules/permissions/PaymasterGuardModule.sol 90.00% (9/10) 86.67% (13/15) 100.00% (2/2) 71.43% (5/7)
src/modules/permissions/TimeRangeModule.sol 83.33% (10/12) 80.00% (16/20) 100.00% (1/1) 75.00% (6/8)
src/modules/validation/SingleSignerValidationModule.sol 92.00% (23/25) 81.58% (31/38) 62.50% (5/8) 90.00% (9/10)
src/modules/validation/WebAuthnValidationModule.sol 61.11% (11/18) 66.67% (18/27) 100.00% (3/3) 60.00% (6/10)
Total 94.27% (1135/1204) 93.13% (1423/1528) 77.60% (149/192) 85.45% (182/213)

Copy link

octane-security-app-dev bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Overview

Vulnerabilities found: 1                                                                                

Detailed findings

src/modules/permissions/AllowlistModule.sol

  • Review potential Validation Check Does Not Fall Through issue that is exposed in the onUninstall function

🔗 Commit Hash: 5b9dbd7
🛡️ Octane Dashboard: All vulnerabilities

Copy link

octane-security-app-dev bot commented Nov 8, 2024

Overview

Vulnerabilities found: 5                                                                                

Detailed findings

src/modules/permissions/AllowlistModule.sol


🔗 Commit Hash: 5b9dbd7
🛡️ Octane Dashboard: All vulnerabilities

setAddressAllowlist(entityId, input.target, true, input.hasSelectorAllowlist);
setAddressAllowlist(
entityId, input.target, true, input.hasSelectorAllowlist, input.hasERC20SpendLimit
);
updateLimits(entityId, input.target, input.hasERC20SpendLimit, input.erc20SpendLimit);
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Will this line do a duplicate write?

Copy link
Collaborator Author

@howydev howydev Nov 8, 2024

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

not compared to the original, hasSelectorAllowlist and hasERC20SpendLimit are bools packed into the same storage slot

@howydev howydev changed the title fix: address allowlist can be set independently of spend limits fix: [CL-009] address allowlist can be set independently of spend limits Nov 8, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@adamegyed adamegyed left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good!

@howydev howydev merged commit 0733d40 into develop Nov 14, 2024
6 checks passed
@howydev howydev deleted the howy/fix-cl-9 branch November 14, 2024 02:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants