You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Starsolo performs perfectly on human and mouse samples. However, it performs strangely on a Saccharomyces_cerevisiae sample. I found that the number of reads assigned to features is low:
STAR Version 2.7.11
Starsolo performs perfectly on human and mouse samples. However, it performs strangely on a Saccharomyces_cerevisiae sample. I found that the number of reads assigned to features is low:
*.Solo.out/GeneFull_Ex50pAS/Features.stats
However, using featureCounts to quantify the same BAM output by Starsolo can yield much higher assigned reads.
This is an example of a read that is assigned to YAL038W (XT tag) in featureCounts, but cannot be assigned to the gene in starsolo:
A nearby read can be correctly assigned by both featureCounts and starsolo
Definition of YAL038W in gtf
starsolo.Log.out.txt
genomeGenerate.Log.out.txt
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: