ci: wrong tagging on the coverage artifacts

[germa89]

Description

The CICD was uploading all the remote testing as CentOS.

Issue linked

Close #3190

Checklist

• I have visited and read Develop PyMAPDL.
• I have tested my changes locally
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the PyMAPDL coding style guidelines.
• I have added appropriate unit tests that also ensure the minimal coverage criteria.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have marked this PR as draft if it is not ready to be reviewed yet.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Commit naming conventions (e.g. feat: adding new MAPDL command)

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.21%. Comparing base (7c1eb1e) to head (0980625).
Report is 26 commits behind head on main.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (7c1eb1e) and HEAD (0980625). Click for more details.

HEAD has 110 uploads less than BASE

| Flag | BASE (7c1eb1e) | HEAD (0980625) | |------|------|------| |minimal|20|2| |ubuntu|40|4| |local|40|4| |v24.1-ubuntu-student|12|2| |latest-ubuntu-student|12|2|

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3225      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   86.63%   80.21%   -6.43%     
==========================================
  Files          52       53       +1     
  Lines        9550     9625      +75     
==========================================
- Hits         8274     7721     -553     
- Misses       1276     1904     +628