docs: documenting new naming conventions for commits, branches and PRs.

[germa89]

Description

As the title. I want to have everything clearly stated in the PyMAPDL development section.

Issue linked

Close #3218

Checklist

• I have visited and read Develop PyMAPDL.
• I have tested my changes locally
• I have added necessary documentation or updated existing documentation.
• I have followed the PyMAPDL coding style guidelines.
• I have added appropriate unit tests that also ensure the minimal coverage criteria.
• I have reviewed my changes before submitting this pull request.
• I have linked the issue or issues that are solved to the PR if any.
• I have assigned this PR to myself.
• I have marked this PR as draft if it is not ready to be reviewed yet.
• I have made sure that the title of my PR follows Commit naming conventions (e.g. feat: adding new MAPDL command)

[ansys-reviewer-bot]

Thanks for opening a Pull Request. If you want to perform a review write a comment saying:

@ansys-reviewer-bot review

[wiz-inc-572fc38784]

Wiz Scan Summary

IaC Misconfigurations
Vulnerabilities
Sensitive Data
Total
Secrets

[germa89]

NOT finished.

I need to fix the labels.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 80.21%. Comparing base (cda716a) to head (68cb8ef).

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #3228      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   82.64%   80.21%   -2.44%     
==========================================
  Files          53       53              
  Lines        9625     9625              
==========================================
- Hits         7955     7721     -234     
- Misses       1670     1904     +234     

[germa89]

Ok. Now it is ready.

[PipKat]

Minor edits--mostly to get rid of "etc."--as we want to avoid Latin phrases.

[MaxJPRey]

LGTM.

[germa89]

many people approved it. Hence @pyansys-ci-bot LGTM.

[jorgepiloto]

✅ Approving this PR because germa89 said so in here 😬

[germa89]

I had to disable Require review from Code Owners because @jorgepiloto is not a code owner.

P.D.- @pyansys-ci-bot token has been replaced by a @jorgepiloto's one. Hence for this PR to be merged I had to disable the above requirement, since the workflow now is triggered with @jorgepiloto's credentials which is not a codeowner.

[RobPasMue]

Why not add him to the team temporarily?

[germa89]

Codeowners require to edit the Codeowners file. I rather change not change files. :)

[RobPasMue]

No, you do not need to change the file - you just need to add @jorgepiloto to the @ansys/pymapdl-maintainers team.

pymapdl/.github/CODEOWNERS

Line 8 in a0028e6

* @ansys/pymapdl-maintainers