Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FLINK-33340] Upgrade jackson to 2.15.3 #126

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 13, 2023

Conversation

snuyanzin
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

- com.fasterxml.jackson.dataformat:jackson-dataformat-yaml:2.15.3
- com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jdk8:2.15.3
- com.fasterxml.jackson.datatype:jackson-datatype-jsr310:2.15.3
- org.yaml:snakeyaml:2.1
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

jackson dataformat since 2.15.x depends on snakeyaml 2.1

@snuyanzin
Copy link
Contributor Author

resolved conflicts

@snuyanzin snuyanzin merged commit 9fef53a into apache:master Nov 13, 2023
1 check passed
@@ -78,6 +78,9 @@ under the License.
<plugin>
<groupId>org.apache.maven.plugins</groupId>
<artifactId>maven-shade-plugin</artifactId>
<!-- Jackson uses multi release jars and in case 1.15.x there is version 19
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
<!-- Jackson uses multi release jars and in case 1.15.x there is version 19
<!-- Jackson uses multi release jars and in case 2.15.x there is version 19

@snuyanzin that's a typo, isn't it?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

yes, you're right, thanks for highlighting I will submit a hotfix PR for that

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants