Support for Map data type in UI

[esakkiraj]

Support for Map data types in UI. Handled in both Schema page and Query page.

Related Backend PR: #13906

Screenshots:

--------

[jayeshchoudhary]

@esakkiraj what about other places where we show schema details
like table details page. are we using the same component to render schema table?

[jayeshchoudhary]

what will happen if the data is overflowing the cell?

[esakkiraj]

@esakkiraj what about other places where we show schema details like table details page. are we using the same component to render schema table?

@jayeshchoudhary Yes it is handled.

[esakkiraj]

what will happen if the data is overflowing the cell?

@jayeshchoudhary Yeah good catch. @raghavyadav01 Any thoughts on this what should be done ? Should we trim the data if its beyond certain limit (Eg: 100 chars) and append "...".

[raghavyadav01]

What is the current behavior for JSON column types? We should keep the same.

[codecov-commenter]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 55.45%. Comparing base (59551e4) to head (698f7ea).
Report is 1203 commits behind head on master.

❗ There is a different number of reports uploaded between BASE (59551e4) and HEAD (698f7ea). Click for more details.

HEAD has 11 uploads less than BASE

Flag	BASE (59551e4)	HEAD (698f7ea)
integration2	3	2
temurin	12	11
skip-bytebuffers-false	7	5
unittests	5	3
java-11	5	3
unittests2	3	0

Additional details and impacted files

@@             Coverage Diff              @@
##             master   #14245      +/-   ##
============================================
- Coverage     61.75%   55.45%   -6.30%     
- Complexity      207      797     +590     
============================================
  Files          2436     2074     -362     
  Lines        133233   109458   -23775     
  Branches      20636    17332    -3304     
============================================
- Hits          82274    60702   -21572     
+ Misses        44911    43914     -997     
+ Partials       6048     4842    -1206     

Flag	Coverage Δ
custom-integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration1	100.00% <ø> (+99.99%)	⬆️
integration2	0.00% <ø> (ø)
java-11	55.43% <ø> (-6.28%)	⬇️
java-21	55.28% <ø> (-6.35%)	⬇️
skip-bytebuffers-false	55.45% <ø> (-6.30%)	⬇️
skip-bytebuffers-true	55.24% <ø> (+27.51%)	⬆️
temurin	55.45% <ø> (-6.30%)	⬇️
unittests	55.45% <ø> (-6.30%)	⬇️
unittests1	55.45% <ø> (+8.56%)	⬆️
unittests2	?

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.