Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(appset): filtering repos by archived status #20736

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

aburan28
Copy link

@aburan28 aburan28 commented Nov 10, 2024

This PR adds a filter on repos to choose if archived repos are to be included in the scm generator.
For now this only includes github and gitea.

Closes [ISSUE https://github.com//issues/18531]

Checklist:

  • Either (a) I've created an enhancement proposal and discussed it with the community, (b) this is a bug fix, or (c) this does not need to be in the release notes.
  • The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
  • The title of the PR conforms to the Toolchain Guide
  • I've included "Closes [ISSUE #]" or "Fixes [ISSUE #]" in the description to automatically close the associated issue.
  • I've updated both the CLI and UI to expose my feature, or I plan to submit a second PR with them.
  • Does this PR require documentation updates?
  • I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
  • I have signed off all my commits as required by DCO
  • I have written unit and/or e2e tests for my change. PRs without these are unlikely to be merged.
  • My build is green (troubleshooting builds).
  • My new feature complies with the feature status guidelines.
  • I have added a brief description of why this PR is necessary and/or what this PR solves.
  • Optional. My organization is added to USERS.md.
  • Optional. For bug fixes, I've indicated what older releases this fix should be cherry-picked into (this may or may not happen depending on risk/complexity).

Signed-off-by: adam_buran <adam.buran@airbnb.com>
@aburan28 aburan28 requested review from a team as code owners November 10, 2024 18:52
Copy link

bunnyshell bot commented Nov 10, 2024

❗ Preview Environment deployment failed on Bunnyshell

See: Environment Details | Pipeline Logs

Available commands (reply to this comment):

  • 🚀 /bns:deploy to redeploy the environment
  • /bns:delete to remove the environment

Signed-off-by: adam_buran <adam.buran@airbnb.com>
@aburan28 aburan28 force-pushed the adam--scm-filtering-archived-repos branch from f0a0621 to af0b921 Compare November 10, 2024 18:53
@aburan28 aburan28 changed the title Adam scm filtering archived repos feat(appset): filtering repos by archived status Nov 10, 2024
Signed-off-by: adam_buran <adam.buran@airbnb.com>
Signed-off-by: adam_buran <adam.buran@airbnb.com>
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 10, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 75.00000% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 55.09%. Comparing base (b78f209) to head (d332aa0).
Report is 5 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
applicationset/generators/scm_provider.go 33.33% 2 Missing ⚠️
applicationset/services/scm_provider/github_app.go 0.00% 2 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #20736      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   55.17%   55.09%   -0.08%     
==========================================
  Files         324      324              
  Lines       55259    55265       +6     
==========================================
- Hits        30487    30450      -37     
- Misses      22158    22192      +34     
- Partials     2614     2623       +9     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@andrii-korotkov-verkada andrii-korotkov-verkada left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Member

@ishitasequeira ishitasequeira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Overall PR looks good!! @aburan28 can you resolve the conflicts?

@@ -160,6 +165,7 @@ spec:
* `allBranches`: By default (false) the template will only be evaluated for the default branch of each repo. If this is true, every branch of every repository will be passed to the filters. If using this flag, you likely want to use a `branchMatch` filter.
* `tokenRef`: A `Secret` name and key containing the Gitea access token to use for requests. If not specified, will make anonymous requests which have a lower rate limit and can only see public repositories.
* `insecure`: Allow for self-signed TLS certificates.
* `excludeArchivedRepos`: exclude repositories that are archived. defaults to false\
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nit: remove the additional \ at the end?

Signed-off-by: Adam Buran <aburan28@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Adam Buran <aburan28@gmail.com>
Copy link
Member

@ishitasequeira ishitasequeira left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@aburan28 , looks like the CI are failing with your latest changes.

@aburan28 aburan28 requested a review from a team as a code owner November 16, 2024 00:01
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants