feat: standardize ci #279
feat: standardize ci #279
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #279 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 84.17% 84.17%
=======================================
Files 15 15
Lines 3437 3437
=======================================
Hits 2893 2893
Misses 381 381
Partials 163 163 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
This pull request sets up GitHub code scanning for this repository. Once the scans have completed and the checks have passed, the analysis results for this pull request branch will appear on this overview. Once you merge this pull request, the 'Security' tab will show more code scanning analysis results (for example, for the default branch). Depending on your configuration and choice of analysis tool, future pull requests will be annotated with code scanning analysis results. For more information about GitHub code scanning, check out the documentation. |
| # the `language` matrix defined below to confirm you have the correct set of | ||
| # supported CodeQL languages. | ||
| # | ||
| name: "CodeQL" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Do we need this? It seems to be a question in armada if we want this check.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
I think it still serves a purpose as a static code checker
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito