-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 136
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
(flaky): unit test is flaky #2898
Conversation
Codecov ReportPatch coverage has no change and project coverage change:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #2898 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 47.34% 47.36% +0.02%
==========================================
Files 395 395
Lines 44045 44045
Branches 487 487
==========================================
+ Hits 20854 20864 +10
- Misses 21600 21602 +2
+ Partials 1591 1579 -12
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
I think you need to pull in #2817 to reproduce this test failure actually. Feel free to pull that update into this PR and verify that it passes with your change. |
yah sure |
Test: Result: Elapsed: Ran 15 test(s) in 1m32.080266749s |
The tests that are failing are unit tests not testsuite. If you get the merge conflicts fixed you can verify that this passes. The tests won't run because it says there is a merge issue. |
|
and I by mistake merge older changes which causing merge conflicts |
@sarthaksarthak9 please fix the lint errors and I will get this merged |
ok |
|
okk |
I am trying from yesterday but I am not able to resolved this .. sarthak@:~/armada$ mage lint-fix |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dejanzele @Mo-Fatah Do either of you know how to fix the tests on this PR?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you look at the go.mod job, you can get some help on this.
One needs to run go mod tidy
and push those changes. I think our CI is saying that the go.mod is different from go.sum or whatever.
From that, I think most of it will come into place.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think I did some mistake during resolving merge conflicts
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Apart from linting, the proto and go mod failures will be fixed with just go mod tidy
@sarthaksarthak9 Sorry it is:
|
@sarthaksarthak9 can you run |
yah, sure |
Fixes #2863
Special notes for your reviewer:
┆Issue is synchronized with this Jira Task by Unito