diff --git a/ensemble-learning.html b/ensemble-learning.html
index 6530075..3dcab8a 100644
--- a/ensemble-learning.html
+++ b/ensemble-learning.html
@@ -171,18 +171,31 @@ Content
Introduction
Ensemble learning in machine learning refers to techniques that combine the predictions from multiple models (learners) to improve the overall performance. The main idea is that a group of weak learners (models with moderate accuracy) can come together to form a strong learner. Ensemble methods can often achieve better results than individual models by reducing variance, bias, or improving predictions.
- Types of Ensemble Learning Methods:
+
+
+ Ensemble Techniques in Machine Learning: Here are some of the most commonly used ensemble techniques:
- Bagging (Bootstrap Aggregating)
- Boosting
- - Stacking
+ - Stacking (Stacked Generalization)
+ - Blending
+
+ These ensemble techniques can significantly improve the accuracy and robustness of machine learning models by leveraging the strengths of multiple models. However, it’s important to note that ensemble methods may come at the cost of interpretability, as the final model becomes more complex.
+
+ Algorithms for Ensemble Learning:
+
- Random Forest
- Voting
- - Blending
+
- Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs)
- XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost
- Bagging Variants
+
+
+
@@ -233,7 +246,13 @@ 3. Stacking (Stacked generation)
4. Random Forest
- A Random Forest is an extension of the bagging technique, where multiple decision trees are used as the base learners. The key difference from bagging is that Random Forest introduces additional randomness by selecting a random subset of features at each split in the decision trees.
+ A Random Forest is an extension of the bagging technique, where multiple decision trees are used as the base learners. The key difference from bagging is that Random Forest introduces additional randomness by selecting a random subset of features at each split in the decision trees. Here are key points about Random Forest:
+
+ - Random Forest involves creating multiple decision trees by selecting random subsets of features and data points to build each tree.
+ - Each tree in the forest is trained independently, and the final prediction is made by aggregating the predictions of all trees through voting or averaging.
+ - This algorithm is known for its robustness against overfitting and its ability to handle high-dimensional data effectively.
+ - Random Forest is widely used in various applications due to its simplicity, scalability, and high accuracy in both classification and regression tasks.
+
Assume we have \( B \) decision trees \( T_1(x), T_2(x), \dots, T_B(x) \), each trained on different bootstrap samples and a random subset of features. The final prediction is:
@@ -276,10 +295,10 @@ 5. Voting
6. Blending
Blending is similar to stacking, but the key difference is how the meta-model is trained. In stacking, the base models are trained using cross-validation, and their predictions are passed to the meta-model. In blending, a holdout validation set is used for training the meta-model, and the base models are trained on the entire training set.
- Let the training set be split into two parts:
+ These ensemble techniques can significantly improve the accuracy and robustness of machine learning models by leveraging the strengths of multiple models. However, it’s important to note that ensemble methods may come at the cost of interpretability, as the final model becomes more complex.
- Blending is similar to stacking, but it uses a simpler approach to combine the predictions of the base models. Instead of training a meta-model, blending uses a weighted average of the base model predictions. The weights are determined based on the performance of each base model on a validation set or using a grid search technique.
+ Let the training set be split into two parts:
- Training set for base models: \( X_{\text{train}} \)
@@ -329,12 +348,12 @@ 7. Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs)
8. XGBoost, LightGBM, and CatBoost
These are highly optimized and scalable implementations of Gradient Boosting, each offering its own improvements:
- - XGBoostuses regularization to reduce overfitting.
+ - XGBoost uses regularization to reduce overfitting.
- LightGBM focuses on efficiency by using a leaf-wise tree growth strategy.
- CatBoost is optimized for categorical features and reduces overfitting through feature combination techniques.
While the underlying method remains similar to Gradient Boosting Machines (GBMs), these methods introduce optimizations in tree building, feature handling, and regularization.
-
+
9. Bagging Variants
@@ -345,17 +364,12 @@ 9. Bagging Variants
-
+