Skip to content

Machine-learning models to predict credit risk using free data from LendingClub. Imbalanced-learn and Scikit-learn libraries to build and evaluate models by using Resampling and Ensemble Learning

Notifications You must be signed in to change notification settings

arzuisiktopbas/Risky_Business

Folders and files

NameName
Last commit message
Last commit date

Latest commit

 

History

3 Commits
 
 
 
 
 
 

Repository files navigation

Risky Business

by Arzu Isik Topbas

I built and evaluated several machine-learning models to predict credit risk using free data from LendingClub. Credit risk is an inherently imbalanced classification problem , so I used different techniques for training and evaluating models with imbalanced classes. I used the imbalanced-learn and Scikit-learn libraries to build and evaluate models using resampling and ensembling learning techniques.


1 - Resampling

I used the imbalanced learn library to resample the LendingClub data and built and evaluated logistic regression classifiers using the resampled data.

1.1 - Oversample

In this section, you compared two oversampling algorithms to determine which algorithm results in the best performance. You will oversample the data using the Naive Random Oversampling algorithm and the SMOTE Oversampling algorithm.

1.1.1 - Naive Random Oversampling

  • balanced accuracy score = 0.65
  • recall score = 0.65
  • geometric mean score = 0.65

1.1.2 - SMOTE Oversampling

  • balanced accuracy score = 0.64
  • recall score = 0.57
  • geometric mean score = 0.63

1.2 - Undersample

In this section, I tested an undersampling algorithms - the Cluster Centroids algorithm - to determine which algorithm results in the best performance compared to the oversampling algorithms above.

1.2.1 - Cluster Centroids algorithm

  • balanced accuracy score = 0.78
  • recall score = 0.77
  • geometric mean score = 0.78

1.3 - Combination (Over and Under) Sampling

In this section, I tested a combination Over- and Under-Sampling algorithm to determine if the algorithm results in the best performance compared to the other sampling algorithms above by using the SMOTEENN algorithm

1.3.1 - SMOTEENN

  • balanced accuracy score = 0.49
  • recall score = 0.01
  • geometric mean score = 0.08

Which model had the best balanced accuracy score?

  • The Cluster Centroids algorithm has the best balanced accuracy score(0.78).

Which model had the best recall score?

  • The Cluster Centroids algorithm has the best recall score(0.77).

Which model had the best geometric mean score?

  • The Cluster Centroids algorithm has the best geometric mean score(0.78).

2 - Ensemble Learning

I compared two different ensemble classifiers to predict loan risk and evaluate each model. I used the Balanced Random Forest Classifier and the Easy Ensemble Classifier.

2.1 - Balanced Random Forest Classifier

  • balanced accuracy score = 0.79
  • recall score = 0.91
  • geometric mean score = 0.78
  • the top three features = total_rec_prncp (0.073767), total_rec_int (0.063903), total_pymnt_inv (0.060733)

2.1 - Easy Ensemble Classifier

  • balanced accuracy score = 0.93
  • recall score = 0.94
  • geometric mean score = 0.93

Which model had the best balanced accuracy score?

  • The Easy Ensemble Classifier has the best balanced accuracy score(0.93).

Which model had the best recall score?

  • The Easy Ensemble Classifier has the best recall score(0.94).

Which model had the best geometric mean score?

  • The Easy Ensemble Classifier has the best geometric mean score(0.93).

What are the top three features?

  • total_rec_prncp (0.073767)
  • total_rec_int (0.063903)
  • total_pymnt_inv (0.060733)

About

Machine-learning models to predict credit risk using free data from LendingClub. Imbalanced-learn and Scikit-learn libraries to build and evaluate models by using Resampling and Ensemble Learning

Topics

Resources

Stars

Watchers

Forks

Releases

No releases published

Packages

No packages published