Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[FEATURE] Increased support for AVRO logical types #288

Open
2 tasks done
charlyannereau opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks done

[FEATURE] Increased support for AVRO logical types #288

charlyannereau opened this issue Jun 24, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@charlyannereau
Copy link

Why do we need this improvement?

There is only a partial support of AVRO logical types.
For instance, UUID avro logical type is supported and passed through as an output in the JSON schema.
On the contrary Date avro logical type is not passed through as an output in the JSON schema.

How will this change help?

Better representation of avro schema. Especially when we render avro schema through html template it would provide a more accurate description of it.

Screenshots

No response

How could it be implemented/designed?

Similarly to how UUID support was implemented, using the jsonSchema format tag.

🚧 Breaking changes

No

👀 Have you checked for similar open issues?

  • I checked and didn't find a similar issue

🏢 Have you read the Contributing Guidelines?

Are you willing to work on this issue?

None

@charlyannereau charlyannereau added the enhancement New feature or request label Jun 24, 2024
Copy link

Welcome to AsyncAPI. Thanks a lot for reporting your first issue. Please check out our contributors guide and the instructions about a basic recommended setup useful for opening a pull request.
Keep in mind there are also other channels you can use to interact with AsyncAPI community. For more details check out this issue.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant