-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 187
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix: generate doc for getters #1780
Merged
jonaslagoni
merged 7 commits into
asyncapi:master
from
akkshitgupta:fix/ts-playground-doc
Feb 15, 2024
Merged
Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
a76bfd4
fix: generate doc for getters
akkshitgupta 024a33f
fix: snapshot testing error
akkshitgupta 4327d2a
Merge branch 'master' into fix/ts-playground-doc
jonaslagoni 2814b49
Merge branch 'master' into fix/ts-playground-doc
jonaslagoni d6fe12e
Merge branch 'master' into fix/ts-playground-doc
Samridhi-98 473c6c4
Merge branch 'master' into fix/ts-playground-doc
Samridhi-98 e9c692b
Merge branch 'master' into fix/ts-playground-doc
jonaslagoni File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
We need to make it slightly more advanced, and use the options argument to conditionally write docs for properties or getters depending on whether the option for using getters is sat 🙂
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I could not understand from the given issue description, unfortunately.
Can you confirm whether the option we are referring to is passed from the playground UI just like includeDescription or there is any other way for that.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Sorry for the late reply @akkshitgupta 🙇
So actually I see that it's quite hard to check whether we are using getters or properties, cause it's determined based on the presets that the user includes.
As a quick workaround, lets add the description both for getter and property (does not matter if there are duplicate information for now ✌️
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I understand that you are occupied with your work as well. Thank you for being helpful as it encourages me to accept more challenges and continue my journey with AsyncAPI.
I would like to solve it out rather than just allowing the duplicates if it not much necessary to include description for getters and hold up the PR for now. LMK WDYT
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am getting so confused with all these PRs targeting different languages where some use getters and setters automatically and others have options to turn them on and off..
For TypeScript it's always on and can't be turned off... So your implementation is excellent 😄