Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add tests for check markdown scirpt #3378

Open
wants to merge 19 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

vishvamsinh28
Copy link
Contributor

@vishvamsinh28 vishvamsinh28 commented Nov 9, 2024

This PR adds tests for check-markdown.js script

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced file processing for markdown validation with improved error handling and asynchronous operations.
    • Exported validation functions for blogs and documentation, enhancing module usability.
  • Tests

    • Introduced a comprehensive suite of unit tests for validating markdown frontmatter, focusing on correctness and error handling, including scenarios for missing fields and filesystem errors.
  • Chores

    • Updated Node.js pull request testing workflow to use a stable version of the Codecov action for improved reliability.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Walkthrough

The changes in this pull request modify the scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js file to utilize asynchronous operations with the fs.promises module, enhancing error handling and control flow. The checkMarkdownFiles function is updated to be asynchronous, and a new test suite is introduced in tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js to validate markdown frontmatter, covering various scenarios and error handling. Additionally, the workflow for Node.js pull request testing is updated to use a stable version of the Codecov action.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js Changed fs import to fs.promises, updated checkMarkdownFiles to be asynchronous, improved error handling, and added export statement for validateBlogs, validateDocs, and checkMarkdownFiles.
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js Introduced unit tests for validating markdown frontmatter using Jest, with asynchronous setup and teardown logic.
.github/workflows/if-nodejs-pr-testing.yml Updated Codecov action from a specific commit hash to a version tag (v4), maintaining overall workflow structure.

Possibly related PRs

  • feat: added test for build-rss.js #3101: The changes in this PR involve updating the rssFeed function to use fs.promises for asynchronous file operations, similar to the main PR's update of checkMarkdownFiles to use fs.promises. Both PRs enhance error handling and utilize asynchronous patterns.
  • test: add markdown tests #3301: This PR adds tests for markdown files, which directly relates to the main PR's changes in check-markdown.js, as both involve validating markdown content and improving the handling of markdown files.
  • feat: add tests for dashboard script #3344: The updates in this PR include a shift to asynchronous file writing with fs-extra, paralleling the changes in scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js that also involve asynchronous file operations.

Suggested labels

ready-to-merge, gsoc

Suggested reviewers

  • derberg
  • magicmatatjahu
  • anshgoyalevil
  • akshatnema
  • Mayaleeeee
  • devilkiller-ag
  • sambhavgupta0705

🐇 In the land of markdown, where texts align,
Functions now export, oh what a fine design!
Tests are all ready, with Jest at the helm,
Validating frontmatter, in our coding realm.
So hop along, friends, let’s celebrate this cheer,
For better code quality is finally here! 🎉


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Deploy Preview for asyncapi-website ready!

Built without sensitive environment variables

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit d0fe33a
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/asyncapi-website/deploys/673af7635d3e100008136fda
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-3378--asyncapi-website.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 9, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 77.00%. Comparing base (b6b0573) to head (d0fe33a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #3378      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   67.77%   77.00%   +9.23%     
==========================================
  Files          21       21              
  Lines         664      661       -3     
==========================================
+ Hits          450      509      +59     
+ Misses        214      152      -62     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@asyncapi-bot
Copy link
Contributor

asyncapi-bot commented Nov 9, 2024

⚡️ Lighthouse report for the changes in this PR:

Category Score
🔴 Performance 34
🟢 Accessibility 98
🟢 Best practices 92
🟢 SEO 100
🔴 PWA 33

Lighthouse ran on https://deploy-preview-3378--asyncapi-website.netlify.app/

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (3)

14-21: Consider improving error handling in beforeEach.

While the setup works, the error handling could be more robust by using async/await pattern instead of the callback approach.

Consider refactoring to:

-    beforeEach(done => {
-        mockConsoleError = jest.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation();
-        fs.mkdtemp(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'test-config'), (err, directory) => {
-            if (err) throw err;
-            tempDir = directory;
-            done();
-        });
-    });
+    beforeEach(async () => {
+        mockConsoleError = jest.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation();
+        tempDir = await fs.promises.mkdtemp(path.join(os.tmpdir(), 'test-config'));
+    });

28-44: Add edge cases to author validation tests.

The current test case doesn't cover all possible scenarios for author validation.

Consider adding tests for:

  • Empty authors array
  • Authors with empty strings
  • Authors with malformed URLs (e.g., missing protocol)
  • Maximum length validation for author fields

46-53: Enhance docs frontmatter validation test coverage.

The current test only checks for invalid types but misses other important scenarios.

Consider adding test cases for:

  • Empty frontmatter object
  • Missing optional fields
  • Edge cases for weight values (negative, zero, decimal)
  • Special characters in title
scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js (3)

148-148: Fix the trailing comma in module.exports.

The trailing comma in the exports statement is unnecessary and inconsistent with the rest of the codebase.

-module.exports = { validateBlogs, validateDocs, checkMarkdownFiles,}
+module.exports = { validateBlogs, validateDocs, checkMarkdownFiles }

Line range hint 9-17: Consider using a more robust URL validation.

The current URL validation might accept invalid URLs in some edge cases. Consider using a more comprehensive validation approach.

 function isValidURL(str) {
     try {
-        new URL(str);
-        return true;
+        const url = new URL(str);
+        // Additional validation for http/https protocols
+        return ['http:', 'https:'].includes(url.protocol);
     } catch (err) {
         return false;
     }
 }

Line range hint 82-144: Consider refactoring to use promises for better testability.

The checkMarkdownFiles function uses nested callbacks, making it harder to test. Consider refactoring to use promises or async/await for better error handling and testability.

Here's a suggested refactor:

async function checkMarkdownFiles(folderPath, validateFunction, relativePath = '') {
    try {
        const files = await fs.promises.readdir(folderPath);
        
        for (const file of files) {
            const filePath = path.join(folderPath, file);
            const relativeFilePath = path.join(relativePath, file);

            if (relativeFilePath.includes('reference/specification')) {
                continue;
            }

            const stats = await fs.promises.stat(filePath);
            
            if (stats.isDirectory()) {
                await checkMarkdownFiles(filePath, validateFunction, relativeFilePath);
            } else if (path.extname(file) === '.md') {
                const fileContent = await fs.promises.readFile(filePath, 'utf-8');
                const { data: frontmatter } = matter(fileContent);

                const errors = validateFunction(frontmatter);
                if (errors) {
                    console.log(`Errors in file ${relativeFilePath}:`);
                    errors.forEach(error => console.log(` - ${error}`));
                    process.exitCode = 1;
                }
            }
        }
    } catch (err) {
        console.error('Error processing files:', err);
        process.exitCode = 1;
    }
}
📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 311886b and a9da240.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js (1 hunks)
  • tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (1 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (1)

1-8: LGTM! Imports are well-organized.

The necessary Node.js built-in modules and validation functions are properly imported.

scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js (1)

147-148: Verify test coverage for exported functions.

The functions are now being exported for testing purposes. Let's verify that appropriate tests have been implemented.

✅ Verification successful

Let me gather more information about the test coverage by examining the actual test implementations.


Let me check the complete test file content to get a full picture of the test coverage.


Test coverage is comprehensive for all exported functions

The test suite includes thorough coverage for all exported functions:

  • validateBlogs: Tests for author validation, multiple validation errors, and invalid frontmatter
  • validateDocs: Tests for required fields validation
  • checkMarkdownFiles: Tests for file processing, error handling for invalid files, and filesystem errors

The tests include proper assertions, error cases, and mock implementations for filesystem operations.

🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify test coverage for the exported functions

# Test 1: Check if test file exists and contains tests for all exported functions
echo "Checking test coverage for exported functions..."
rg -A 5 "describe\(.*(?:validateBlogs|validateDocs|checkMarkdownFiles)" "tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js"

# Test 2: Verify that the functions are only used in the main script and tests
echo "Verifying function usage across codebase..."
rg "(?:validateBlogs|validateDocs|checkMarkdownFiles)" --type js

Length of output: 1748


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Check the actual test implementations
echo "Examining test implementations..."
rg -B 2 -A 10 "describe\('.*'" "tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js"

# Check if there are any test assertions
echo "Checking test assertions..."
rg "expect|assert|should" "tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js"

Length of output: 1192


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Get the complete test file content
echo "Examining complete test file..."
cat "tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js"

Length of output: 3860

Comment on lines 55 to 66
it('checks for errors in markdown files in a directory', done => {
fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tempDir, 'invalid.md'), `---\ntitle: Invalid Blog\n---`);
const mockConsoleLog = jest.spyOn(console, 'log').mockImplementation();

checkMarkdownFiles(tempDir, validateBlogs);

setTimeout(() => {
expect(mockConsoleLog).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors in file invalid.md:'));
mockConsoleLog.mockRestore();
done();
}, 100);
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refactor async tests to use more reliable patterns.

The current implementation has several issues:

  1. Hardcoded timeout values (100ms) might cause flaky tests
  2. setTimeout with done callback is an anti-pattern in Jest
  3. Inconsistent async testing patterns across different test cases

Consider refactoring to use async/await pattern consistently:

-    it('checks for errors in markdown files in a directory', done => {
-        fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tempDir, 'invalid.md'), `---\ntitle: Invalid Blog\n---`);
-        const mockConsoleLog = jest.spyOn(console, 'log').mockImplementation();
-
-        checkMarkdownFiles(tempDir, validateBlogs);
-
-        setTimeout(() => {
-            expect(mockConsoleLog).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors in file invalid.md:'));
-            mockConsoleLog.mockRestore();
-            done();
-        }, 100);
+    it('checks for errors in markdown files in a directory', async () => {
+        fs.writeFileSync(path.join(tempDir, 'invalid.md'), `---\ntitle: Invalid Blog\n---`);
+        const mockConsoleLog = jest.spyOn(console, 'log').mockImplementation();
+
+        await checkMarkdownFiles(tempDir, validateBlogs);
+        
+        expect(mockConsoleLog).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors in file invalid.md:'));
+        mockConsoleLog.mockRestore();

Also applies to: 83-94, 96-108

authors: { name: 'John Doe' }
};
const errors = validateBlogs(frontmatter);
console.log(errors)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Remove debug console.log statement.

Debug logging should not be committed to the test suite.

-        console.log(errors)
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
console.log(errors)

Comment on lines 61 to 66
setTimeout(() => {
expect(mockConsoleLog).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors in file invalid.md:'));
mockConsoleLog.mockRestore();
done();
}, 100);
});
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why are we adding timeout here?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

replaced it with async/await

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 2

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (3)

61-73: Enhance test assertions for multiple validation errors.

The current test only checks the number of errors but not their specific content. Consider adding more specific assertions to ensure the exact validation messages are present.

Consider updating the test like this:

 const errors = validateBlogs(frontmatter);

-expect(errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(3);
+expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([
+  'Title must be a string',
+  'Date must be a valid date string',
+  'Tags must be an array',
+  'Cover must be a string',
+  'Authors must be an array'
+]));
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


24-83: Add test cases for edge cases.

The test suite would benefit from additional test cases covering:

  • Empty frontmatter
  • Malformed YAML
  • Empty authors array
  • Empty tags array

Would you like me to help generate these additional test cases?

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 24-24: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 25-25: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 26-26: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 27-27: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 28-28: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 29-29: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 30-30: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 31-31: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 32-32: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 34-34: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 35-35: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual( with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 36-36: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 37-37: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 38-38: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 39-39: Replace ··]) with ])⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 40-40: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 42-42: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-47: Replace ····expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([⏎············'Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',⏎············'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number' with expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······expect.arrayContaining(['Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',·'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number'])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Replace ········]) with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 51-51: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 52-52: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 53-53: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 55-55: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 57-57: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 58-58: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 59-59: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 75-75: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 76-76: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: 'mockConsoleError' is already declared in the upper scope on line 12 column 9.

(no-shadow)


[error] 78-78: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 79-79: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 80-80: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 81-81: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 82-82: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


1-85: Fix formatting issues throughout the file.

The file has numerous formatting inconsistencies. Consider running Prettier to automatically fix these issues.

Run the following command to fix formatting:

npx prettier --write tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 4-8: Replace ⏎····validateBlogs,⏎····validateDocs,⏎····checkMarkdownFiles⏎ with ·validateBlogs,·validateDocs,·checkMarkdownFiles·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 11-11: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 12-12: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 14-14: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 15-15: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 16-16: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 17-17: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 24-24: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 25-25: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 26-26: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 27-27: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 28-28: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 29-29: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 30-30: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 31-31: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 32-32: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 34-34: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 35-35: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual( with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 36-36: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 37-37: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 38-38: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 39-39: Replace ··]) with ])⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 40-40: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 42-42: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-47: Replace ····expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([⏎············'Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',⏎············'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number' with expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······expect.arrayContaining(['Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',·'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number'])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Replace ········]) with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 51-51: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 52-52: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 53-53: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 55-55: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 57-57: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 58-58: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 59-59: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 75-75: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 76-76: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: 'mockConsoleError' is already declared in the upper scope on line 12 column 9.

(no-shadow)


[error] 78-78: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 79-79: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 80-80: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 81-81: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 82-82: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 83-84: Replace ··});·⏎······· with });

(prettier/prettier)

scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js (1)

134-141: Improve script execution and error handling.

The script execution could be enhanced to properly handle errors and provide better feedback.

Consider wrapping the execution in an async function:

 const docsFolderPath = path.resolve(__dirname, '../../markdown/docs');
 const blogsFolderPath = path.resolve(__dirname, '../../markdown/blog');
 
-checkMarkdownFiles(docsFolderPath, validateDocs);
-checkMarkdownFiles(blogsFolderPath, validateBlogs);
+async function main() {
+    try {
+        await Promise.all([
+            checkMarkdownFiles(docsFolderPath, validateDocs),
+            checkMarkdownFiles(blogsFolderPath, validateBlogs)
+        ]);
+    } catch (err) {
+        console.error('Failed to check markdown files:', err);
+        process.exit(1);
+    }
+}
+
+if (require.main === module) {
+    main();
+}
 
 module.exports = { validateBlogs, validateDocs, checkMarkdownFiles };
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 141-141: Insert ;

(prettier/prettier)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between a9da240 and 4445ce5.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js (2 hunks)
  • tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Learnings (1)
scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js (1)
Learnt from: anshgoyalevil
PR: asyncapi/website#3301
File: scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js:0-0
Timestamp: 2024-10-18T17:28:41.718Z
Learning: In `scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js`, when processing large markdown files with recursion and loops, synchronous file reads (`fs.readFileSync`) are preferred over asynchronous reads.
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch
scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js

[warning] 110-110: scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js#L110
Added line #L110 was not covered by tests

🪛 eslint
scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js

[error] 102-102: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 103-103: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 104-104: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 104-129: iterators/generators require regenerator-runtime, which is too heavyweight for this guide to allow them. Separately, loops should be avoided in favor of array iterations.

(no-restricted-syntax)


[error] 105-105: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 106-106: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 108-108: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 109-109: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 110-110: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 110-110: Unexpected use of continue statement.

(no-continue)


[error] 111-111: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 113-113: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 113-113: Unexpected await inside a loop.

(no-await-in-loop)


[error] 115-115: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 116-116: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 117-117: Delete ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 117-117: Unexpected await inside a loop.

(no-await-in-loop)


[error] 118-118: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 119-119: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 119-119: Unexpected await inside a loop.

(no-await-in-loop)


[error] 120-120: Delete ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 122-122: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 123-123: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 124-124: Delete ··········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 125-125: Replace ····················errors.forEach(error with ··········errors.forEach((error)

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 126-126: Replace ···················· with ··········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 127-127: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 128-128: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 129-129: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 130-130: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 131-131: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 132-132: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 141-141: Insert ;

(prettier/prettier)

tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js

[error] 4-8: Replace ⏎····validateBlogs,⏎····validateDocs,⏎····checkMarkdownFiles⏎ with ·validateBlogs,·validateDocs,·checkMarkdownFiles·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 11-11: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 12-12: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 14-14: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 15-15: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 16-16: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 17-17: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 24-24: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 25-25: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 26-26: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 27-27: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 28-28: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 29-29: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 30-30: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 31-31: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 32-32: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 34-34: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 35-35: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual( with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 36-36: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 37-37: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 38-38: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 39-39: Replace ··]) with ])⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 40-40: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 42-42: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-47: Replace ····expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([⏎············'Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',⏎············'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number' with expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······expect.arrayContaining(['Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',·'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number'])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Replace ········]) with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 51-51: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 52-52: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 53-53: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 55-55: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 57-57: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 58-58: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 59-59: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 75-75: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 76-76: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: 'mockConsoleError' is already declared in the upper scope on line 12 column 9.

(no-shadow)


[error] 78-78: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 79-79: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 80-80: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 81-81: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 82-82: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 83-84: Replace ··});·⏎······· with });

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js (1)

1-1: 🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider using synchronous file operations.

A previous implementation (PR #3301) found that synchronous operations (fs.readFileSync) are preferred when processing large markdown files with recursion and loops. The current change to fs.promises might impact performance.

Let's verify the performance impact:

Consider reverting to synchronous operations:

-const fs = require('fs').promises;
+const fs = require('fs');

Comment on lines +11 to +13
let tempDir;
let mockConsoleError;

Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ Potential issue

Fix variable shadowing of mockConsoleError.

The mockConsoleError variable is already declared in the outer scope (line 12) but is redeclared in the test case (line 77). This could lead to confusion and potential issues.

Apply this fix:

 it('logs error to console when an error occurs in checkMarkdownFiles', async () => {
     const invalidFolderPath = path.join(tempDir, 'non-existent-folder');
-    const mockConsoleError = jest.spyOn(console, 'error').mockImplementation();

     await checkMarkdownFiles(invalidFolderPath, validateBlogs);

     expect(mockConsoleError.mock.calls[0][0]).toContain('Error processing files:');
-    mockConsoleError.mockRestore();
 });

Also applies to: 75-82

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 11-11: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 12-12: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

Comment on lines +101 to +132
async function checkMarkdownFiles(folderPath, validateFunction, relativePath = '') {
try {
const files = await fs.readdir(folderPath);
for (const file of files) {
const filePath = path.join(folderPath, file);
const relativeFilePath = path.join(relativePath, file);

// Skip the folder 'docs/reference/specification'
if (relativeFilePath.includes('reference/specification')) {
return;
continue;
}

fs.stat(filePath, (err, stats) => {
if (err) {
console.error('Error reading file stats:', err);
return;
}
const stats = await fs.stat(filePath);

// Recurse if directory, otherwise validate markdown file
if (stats.isDirectory()) {
await checkMarkdownFiles(filePath, validateFunction, relativeFilePath);
} else if (path.extname(file) === '.md') {
const fileContent = await fs.readFile(filePath, 'utf-8');
const { data: frontmatter } = matter(fileContent);

// Recurse if directory, otherwise validate markdown file
if (stats.isDirectory()) {
checkMarkdownFiles(filePath, validateFunction, relativeFilePath);
} else if (path.extname(file) === '.md') {
const fileContent = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf-8');
const { data: frontmatter } = matter(fileContent);

const errors = validateFunction(frontmatter);
if (errors) {
console.log(`Errors in file ${relativeFilePath}:`);
errors.forEach(error => console.log(` - ${error}`));
process.exitCode = 1;
}
const errors = validateFunction(frontmatter);
if (errors) {
console.log(`Errors in file ${relativeFilePath}:`);
errors.forEach(error => console.log(` - ${error}`));
process.exitCode = 1;
}
});
});
});
}
}
} catch (err) {
console.error('Error processing files:', err);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Enhance error handling and optimize async operations.

Several improvements could be made to this function:

  1. The error handling is too generic
  2. Multiple await operations inside the loop could impact performance
  3. The 'reference/specification' skip condition needs test coverage

Consider these improvements:

 async function checkMarkdownFiles(folderPath, validateFunction, relativePath = '') {
     try {
         const files = await fs.readdir(folderPath);
+        const filePromises = files.map(async file => {
             const filePath = path.join(folderPath, file);
             const relativeFilePath = path.join(relativePath, file);
 
             if (relativeFilePath.includes('reference/specification')) {
                 return;
             }
 
-            const stats = await fs.stat(filePath);
+            try {
+                const stats = await fs.stat(filePath);
 
-            if (stats.isDirectory()) {
-                await checkMarkdownFiles(filePath, validateFunction, relativeFilePath);
-            } else if (path.extname(file) === '.md') {
-                const fileContent = await fs.readFile(filePath, 'utf-8');
-                const { data: frontmatter } = matter(fileContent);
+                if (stats.isDirectory()) {
+                    await checkMarkdownFiles(filePath, validateFunction, relativeFilePath);
+                } else if (path.extname(file) === '.md') {
+                    const fileContent = await fs.readFile(filePath, 'utf-8');
+                    const { data: frontmatter } = matter(fileContent);
 
-                const errors = validateFunction(frontmatter);
-                if (errors) {
-                    console.log(`Errors in file ${relativeFilePath}:`);
-                    errors.forEach(error => console.log(` - ${error}`));
-                    process.exitCode = 1;
+                    const errors = validateFunction(frontmatter);
+                    if (errors) {
+                        console.log(`Errors in file ${relativeFilePath}:`);
+                        errors.forEach(error => console.log(` - ${error}`));
+                        process.exitCode = 1;
+                    }
                 }
+            } catch (err) {
+                console.error(`Error processing file ${relativeFilePath}:`, err);
+                throw err;
             }
-        }
+        });
+        await Promise.all(filePromises);
     } catch (err) {
-        console.error('Error processing files:', err);
+        console.error(`Error in directory ${folderPath}:`, err);
+        throw err;
     }
 }
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
async function checkMarkdownFiles(folderPath, validateFunction, relativePath = '') {
try {
const files = await fs.readdir(folderPath);
for (const file of files) {
const filePath = path.join(folderPath, file);
const relativeFilePath = path.join(relativePath, file);
// Skip the folder 'docs/reference/specification'
if (relativeFilePath.includes('reference/specification')) {
return;
continue;
}
fs.stat(filePath, (err, stats) => {
if (err) {
console.error('Error reading file stats:', err);
return;
}
const stats = await fs.stat(filePath);
// Recurse if directory, otherwise validate markdown file
if (stats.isDirectory()) {
await checkMarkdownFiles(filePath, validateFunction, relativeFilePath);
} else if (path.extname(file) === '.md') {
const fileContent = await fs.readFile(filePath, 'utf-8');
const { data: frontmatter } = matter(fileContent);
// Recurse if directory, otherwise validate markdown file
if (stats.isDirectory()) {
checkMarkdownFiles(filePath, validateFunction, relativeFilePath);
} else if (path.extname(file) === '.md') {
const fileContent = fs.readFileSync(filePath, 'utf-8');
const { data: frontmatter } = matter(fileContent);
const errors = validateFunction(frontmatter);
if (errors) {
console.log(`Errors in file ${relativeFilePath}:`);
errors.forEach(error => console.log(` - ${error}`));
process.exitCode = 1;
}
const errors = validateFunction(frontmatter);
if (errors) {
console.log(`Errors in file ${relativeFilePath}:`);
errors.forEach(error => console.log(` - ${error}`));
process.exitCode = 1;
}
});
});
});
}
}
} catch (err) {
console.error('Error processing files:', err);
}
async function checkMarkdownFiles(folderPath, validateFunction, relativePath = '') {
try {
const files = await fs.readdir(folderPath);
const filePromises = files.map(async file => {
const filePath = path.join(folderPath, file);
const relativeFilePath = path.join(relativePath, file);
if (relativeFilePath.includes('reference/specification')) {
return;
}
try {
const stats = await fs.stat(filePath);
if (stats.isDirectory()) {
await checkMarkdownFiles(filePath, validateFunction, relativeFilePath);
} else if (path.extname(file) === '.md') {
const fileContent = await fs.readFile(filePath, 'utf-8');
const { data: frontmatter } = matter(fileContent);
const errors = validateFunction(frontmatter);
if (errors) {
console.log(`Errors in file ${relativeFilePath}:`);
errors.forEach(error => console.log(` - ${error}`));
process.exitCode = 1;
}
}
} catch (err) {
console.error(`Error processing file ${relativeFilePath}:`, err);
throw err;
}
});
await Promise.all(filePromises);
} catch (err) {
console.error(`Error in directory ${folderPath}:`, err);
throw err;
}
}
🧰 Tools
🪛 GitHub Check: codecov/patch

[warning] 110-110: scripts/markdown/check-markdown.js#L110
Added line #L110 was not covered by tests

🪛 eslint

[error] 102-102: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 103-103: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 104-104: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 104-129: iterators/generators require regenerator-runtime, which is too heavyweight for this guide to allow them. Separately, loops should be avoided in favor of array iterations.

(no-restricted-syntax)


[error] 105-105: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 106-106: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 108-108: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 109-109: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 110-110: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 110-110: Unexpected use of continue statement.

(no-continue)


[error] 111-111: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 113-113: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 113-113: Unexpected await inside a loop.

(no-await-in-loop)


[error] 115-115: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 116-116: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 117-117: Delete ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 117-117: Unexpected await inside a loop.

(no-await-in-loop)


[error] 118-118: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 119-119: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 119-119: Unexpected await inside a loop.

(no-await-in-loop)


[error] 120-120: Delete ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 122-122: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 123-123: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 124-124: Delete ··········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 125-125: Replace ····················errors.forEach(error with ··········errors.forEach((error)

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 126-126: Replace ···················· with ··········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 127-127: Replace ················ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 128-128: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 129-129: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 130-130: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 131-131: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 132-132: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

@vishvamsinh28
Copy link
Contributor Author

@akshatnema Please review this PR.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (2)

42-49: Enhance docs frontmatter validation test coverage.

Consider adding more edge cases to thoroughly test the validation:

  • Empty string for title
  • Negative or decimal values for weight
  • Missing fields
 it('validates docs frontmatter for required fields', async () => {
-    const frontmatter = { title: 123, weight: 'not-a-number' };
+    const testCases = [
+      { frontmatter: { title: 123, weight: 'not-a-number' }, expectedError: 'Title is missing or not a string' },
+      { frontmatter: { title: '', weight: 1 }, expectedError: 'Title cannot be empty' },
+      { frontmatter: { title: 'Valid', weight: -1 }, expectedError: 'Weight must be a positive number' },
+      { frontmatter: {}, expectedError: 'Title is required' }
+    ];
+
+    for (const { frontmatter, expectedError } of testCases) {
+      const errors = validateDocs(frontmatter);
+      expect(errors).toContain(expectedError);
+    }
 });
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 42-42: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-47: Replace ····expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([⏎············'Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',⏎············'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number' with expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······expect.arrayContaining(['Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',·'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number'])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Delete ····])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


61-73: Make validation error expectations more specific.

The current test only checks the number of errors. Consider asserting specific error messages to ensure the validation logic is working as expected.

 it('returns multiple validation errors for invalid blog frontmatter', async () => {
     const frontmatter = {
         title: 123,
         date: 'invalid-date',
         type: 'blog',
         tags: 'not-an-array',
         cover: ['not-a-string'],
         authors: { name: 'John Doe' }
     };
     const errors = validateBlogs(frontmatter);

-    expect(errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(3);
+    expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([
+        'Title must be a string',
+        'Date must be a valid date string',
+        'Tags must be an array',
+        'Cover must be a string',
+        'Authors must be an array'
+    ]));
 });
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 61-61: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 4445ce5 and 333e0b2.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js

[error] 4-8: Replace ⏎····validateBlogs,⏎····validateDocs,⏎····checkMarkdownFiles⏎ with ·validateBlogs,·validateDocs,·checkMarkdownFiles·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 11-11: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 12-12: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 14-14: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 15-15: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 16-16: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 17-17: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 24-24: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 25-25: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 26-26: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 27-27: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 28-28: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 29-29: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 30-30: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 31-31: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 32-32: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 34-34: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 35-35: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual( with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 36-36: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 37-37: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 38-38: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 39-39: Replace ··]) with ])⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 40-40: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 42-42: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-47: Replace ····expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([⏎············'Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',⏎············'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number' with expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······expect.arrayContaining(['Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',·'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number'])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Delete ····])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 51-51: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 52-52: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 53-53: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 55-55: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 57-57: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 58-58: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 59-59: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 61-61: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 75-75: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 76-76: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: 'mockConsoleError' is already declared in the upper scope on line 12 column 9.

(no-shadow)


[error] 78-78: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 79-79: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 80-80: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 81-81: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 82-82: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 83-83: Replace ··});····· with });

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (2)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (2)

14-22: LGTM! Well-structured test lifecycle hooks.

The setup and teardown logic is well implemented with proper async handling and cleanup.

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 14-14: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 15-15: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 16-16: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 17-17: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


11-13: ⚠️ Potential issue

Fix variable shadowing of mockConsoleError.

The mockConsoleError variable is already declared in the outer scope and is shadowed in a test case below (line 77). This could lead to confusion and potential issues.

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 11-11: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 12-12: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (2)

19-22: Consider adding error handling for cleanup operations

The cleanup in afterEach could fail silently. Consider wrapping it in a try-catch to log any cleanup failures.

 afterEach(async () => {
     mockConsoleError.mockRestore();
-    await fs.rm(tempDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
+    try {
+        await fs.rm(tempDir, { recursive: true, force: true });
+    } catch (error) {
+        console.warn(`Failed to clean up temp directory: ${error.message}`);
+    }
 });
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


61-73: Enhance test specificity for validation errors

The test for multiple validation errors could be more specific about which errors it expects.

 const errors = validateBlogs(frontmatter);

-expect(errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(3);
+expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([
+    'Title must be a string',
+    'Date must be a valid date string',
+    'Tags must be an array',
+    'Cover must be a string',
+    'Authors must be an array'
+]));
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 333e0b2 and 1fbac7c.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js

[error] 4-8: Replace ⏎····validateBlogs,⏎····validateDocs,⏎····checkMarkdownFiles⏎ with ·validateBlogs,·validateDocs,·checkMarkdownFiles·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 11-11: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 12-12: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 14-14: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 15-15: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 16-16: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 17-17: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 24-24: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 25-25: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 26-26: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 27-27: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 28-28: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 29-29: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 30-30: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 31-31: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 32-32: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 34-34: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 35-35: Replace ····expect(errors).toEqual( with expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 36-36: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 37-37: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 38-38: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 39-39: Replace ··])); with ])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 40-40: Delete }

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 41-42: Replace ⏎·· with ··});⏎⏎

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-47: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([⏎············'Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',⏎············'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number' with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······expect.arrayContaining(['Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',·'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number'])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Delete ····])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 51-51: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 52-52: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 53-53: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 55-55: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 57-57: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 58-58: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 59-59: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 75-75: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 76-76: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 78-78: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 79-79: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 80-80: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 81-81: Replace ··});····· with });

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (1)

1-8: LGTM! Clean setup with proper imports

The test setup follows best practices with async fs operations and clean imports.

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 4-8: Replace ⏎····validateBlogs,⏎····validateDocs,⏎····checkMarkdownFiles⏎ with ·validateBlogs,·validateDocs,·checkMarkdownFiles·

(prettier/prettier)

Comment on lines 75 to 81
it('logs error to console when an error occurs in checkMarkdownFiles', async () => {
const invalidFolderPath = path.join(tempDir, 'non-existent-folder');

await checkMarkdownFiles(invalidFolderPath, validateBlogs);

expect(mockConsoleError.mock.calls[0][0]).toContain('Error processing files:');
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Fix variable shadowing and add more error scenarios

  1. The test still has the variable shadowing issue mentioned in past reviews
  2. Consider adding more error scenarios for better coverage
-it('logs error to console when an error occurs in checkMarkdownFiles', async () => {
+describe('error handling', () => {
+    it('logs error for non-existent folder', async () => {
         const invalidFolderPath = path.join(tempDir, 'non-existent-folder');
-    
         await checkMarkdownFiles(invalidFolderPath, validateBlogs);
-    
         expect(mockConsoleError.mock.calls[0][0]).toContain('Error processing files:');
-    });     
+    });
+
+    it('handles invalid file content', async () => {
+        await fs.writeFile(path.join(tempDir, 'invalid.md'), 'Invalid YAML');
+        await checkMarkdownFiles(tempDir, validateBlogs);
+        expect(mockConsoleError).toHaveBeenCalled();
+    });
+});
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
it('logs error to console when an error occurs in checkMarkdownFiles', async () => {
const invalidFolderPath = path.join(tempDir, 'non-existent-folder');
await checkMarkdownFiles(invalidFolderPath, validateBlogs);
expect(mockConsoleError.mock.calls[0][0]).toContain('Error processing files:');
});
describe('error handling', () => {
it('logs error for non-existent folder', async () => {
const invalidFolderPath = path.join(tempDir, 'non-existent-folder');
await checkMarkdownFiles(invalidFolderPath, validateBlogs);
expect(mockConsoleError.mock.calls[0][0]).toContain('Error processing files:');
});
it('handles invalid file content', async () => {
await fs.writeFile(path.join(tempDir, 'invalid.md'), 'Invalid YAML');
await checkMarkdownFiles(tempDir, validateBlogs);
expect(mockConsoleError).toHaveBeenCalled();
});
});
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 75-75: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 76-76: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 78-78: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 79-79: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 80-80: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 81-81: Replace ··});····· with });

(prettier/prettier)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (2)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (2)

61-73: Enhance assertions for multiple validation errors

While the test verifies that multiple errors are present, it would be more robust to verify the specific error messages.

 const errors = validateBlogs(frontmatter);
-expect(errors.length).toBeGreaterThan(3);
+expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([
+  'Title must be a string',
+  'Date must be a valid date string',
+  'Tags must be an array',
+  'Cover must be a string',
+  'Authors must be an array'
+]));
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


83-94: Enhance skip folder test with additional assertions

The test could be more comprehensive by verifying that other files outside the skipped folder are still validated.

 it('skips the "reference/specification" folder during validation', async () => {
   const referenceSpecDir = path.join(tempDir, 'reference', 'specification');
   await fs.mkdir(referenceSpecDir, { recursive: true });
   await fs.writeFile(path.join(referenceSpecDir, 'skipped.md'), `---\ntitle: Skipped File\n---`);
+  await fs.writeFile(path.join(tempDir, 'validated.md'), `---\ntitle: Test File\n---`);
 
   const mockConsoleLog = jest.spyOn(console, 'log').mockImplementation();
 
   await checkMarkdownFiles(tempDir, validateDocs);
 
   expect(mockConsoleLog).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors in file reference/specification/skipped.md'));
+  expect(mockConsoleLog).toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors in file validated.md'));
   mockConsoleLog.mockRestore();
 });
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 83-83: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 84-84: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 85-85: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 86-86: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 87-87: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 88-88: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 89-89: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 90-90: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 91-91: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 92-92: Replace ········expect(mockConsoleLog).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors·in·file·reference/specification/skipped.md')); with ····expect(mockConsoleLog).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(⏎······expect.stringContaining('Errors·in·file·reference/specification/skipped.md')

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 93-93: Insert );⏎

(prettier/prettier)

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 1fbac7c and fada5ab.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js

[error] 4-8: Replace ⏎····validateBlogs,⏎····validateDocs,⏎····checkMarkdownFiles⏎ with ·validateBlogs,·validateDocs,·checkMarkdownFiles·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 11-11: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 12-12: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 14-14: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 15-15: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 16-16: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 17-17: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 24-24: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 25-25: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 26-26: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 27-27: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 28-28: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 29-29: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 30-30: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 31-31: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 32-32: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 34-34: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 35-35: Replace ····expect(errors).toEqual( with expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 36-36: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 37-37: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 38-38: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 39-39: Replace ···]) with ·])⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 40-40: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 42-42: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-47: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([⏎············'Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',⏎············'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number' with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······expect.arrayContaining(['Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',·'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number'])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Delete ····])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 51-51: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 52-52: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 53-53: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 55-55: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 57-57: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 58-58: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 59-59: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 75-75: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 76-76: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 78-78: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 79-79: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 80-80: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 81-81: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 83-83: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 84-84: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 85-85: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 86-86: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 87-87: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 88-88: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 89-89: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 90-90: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 91-91: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 92-92: Replace ········expect(mockConsoleLog).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors·in·file·reference/specification/skipped.md')); with ····expect(mockConsoleLog).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(⏎······expect.stringContaining('Errors·in·file·reference/specification/skipped.md')

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 93-93: Insert );⏎

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 94-95: Replace ··});⏎···· with });

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (3)

1-10: LGTM! Clean setup with proper imports

The test setup follows best practices by using fs.promises for async file operations and properly importing all required dependencies.

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 4-8: Replace ⏎····validateBlogs,⏎····validateDocs,⏎····checkMarkdownFiles⏎ with ·validateBlogs,·validateDocs,·checkMarkdownFiles·

(prettier/prettier)


14-22: LGTM! Well-structured test lifecycle management

The test setup and teardown are properly implemented with:

  • Async/await pattern for file operations
  • Proper cleanup of temporary files and mocks
  • Good test isolation practices
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 14-14: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 15-15: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 16-16: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 17-17: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


24-40: LGTM! Comprehensive validation test for authors array

The test case effectively covers multiple validation scenarios for the authors array, including missing fields and invalid URLs.

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 24-24: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 25-25: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 26-26: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 27-27: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 28-28: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 29-29: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 30-30: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 31-31: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 32-32: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 34-34: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 35-35: Replace ····expect(errors).toEqual( with expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 36-36: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 37-37: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 38-38: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 39-39: Replace ···]) with ·])⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 40-40: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between fada5ab and 68cd3ee.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 eslint
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js

[error] 4-8: Replace ⏎····validateBlogs,⏎····validateDocs,⏎····checkMarkdownFiles⏎ with ·validateBlogs,·validateDocs,·checkMarkdownFiles·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 11-11: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 12-12: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 14-14: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 15-15: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 16-16: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 17-17: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 24-24: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 25-25: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 26-26: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 27-27: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 28-28: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 29-29: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 30-30: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 31-31: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 32-32: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 34-34: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 35-35: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual( with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 36-36: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 37-37: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 38-38: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 39-39: Replace ··]) with ])⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 40-40: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 42-42: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-47: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([⏎············'Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',⏎············'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number' with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······expect.arrayContaining(['Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',·'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number'])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Replace ········]) with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 51-51: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 52-52: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 53-53: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 55-55: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 57-57: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 58-58: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 59-59: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 75-75: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 76-76: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 78-78: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 79-79: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 80-80: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 81-81: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 83-83: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 84-84: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 85-85: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 86-86: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 87-87: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 88-88: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 89-89: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 90-90: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 91-91: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 92-92: Replace ········expect(mockConsoleLog).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors·in·file·reference/specification/skipped.md')); with ····expect(mockConsoleLog).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(⏎······expect.stringContaining('Errors·in·file·reference/specification/skipped.md')

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 93-93: Insert );⏎

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 94-94: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

🔇 Additional comments (3)
tests/markdown/check-markdown.test.js (3)

1-23: LGTM! Well-structured test setup.

The test setup follows best practices with:

  • Proper test isolation using temporary directories
  • Appropriate console mocking
  • Clean resource teardown
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 4-8: Replace ⏎····validateBlogs,⏎····validateDocs,⏎····checkMarkdownFiles⏎ with ·validateBlogs,·validateDocs,·checkMarkdownFiles·

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 11-11: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 12-12: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 14-14: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 15-15: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 16-16: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 17-17: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 19-19: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 20-20: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 21-21: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 22-22: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


24-73: LGTM! Comprehensive test coverage.

The test cases thoroughly cover:

  • Author validation with multiple scenarios
  • Type checking for docs frontmatter
  • File processing with proper async/await
  • Multiple validation errors
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 24-24: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 25-25: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 26-26: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 27-27: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 28-28: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 29-29: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 30-30: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 31-31: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 32-32: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 34-34: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 35-35: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual( with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 36-36: Replace ············ with ········

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 37-37: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 38-38: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 39-39: Replace ··]) with ])⏎····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 40-40: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 42-42: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 43-43: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 44-44: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 45-47: Replace ········expect(errors).toEqual(expect.arrayContaining([⏎············'Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',⏎············'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number' with ····expect(errors).toEqual(⏎······expect.arrayContaining(['Title·is·missing·or·not·a·string',·'Weight·is·missing·or·not·a·number'])

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 48-48: Replace ········]) with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 49-49: Replace ···· with ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 51-51: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 52-52: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 53-53: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 55-55: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 57-57: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 58-58: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 59-59: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 61-61: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 62-62: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 63-63: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 64-64: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 65-65: Delete ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 66-66: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 67-67: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 68-68: Replace ············ with ······

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 69-69: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 70-70: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 72-72: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 73-73: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


83-94: LGTM! Well-implemented folder exclusion test.

The test properly verifies that the specified folder is skipped during validation.

🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 83-83: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 84-84: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 85-85: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 86-86: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 87-87: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 88-88: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 89-89: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 90-90: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 91-91: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 92-92: Replace ········expect(mockConsoleLog).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(expect.stringContaining('Errors·in·file·reference/specification/skipped.md')); with ····expect(mockConsoleLog).not.toHaveBeenCalledWith(⏎······expect.stringContaining('Errors·in·file·reference/specification/skipped.md')

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 93-93: Insert );⏎

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 94-94: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

Comment on lines +75 to +81
it('logs error to console when an error occurs in checkMarkdownFiles', async () => {
const invalidFolderPath = path.join(tempDir, 'non-existent-folder');

await checkMarkdownFiles(invalidFolderPath, validateBlogs);

expect(mockConsoleError.mock.calls[0][0]).toContain('Error processing files:');
});
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Refactor error handling test to follow test suite patterns.

The test case should be restructured to use the existing mockConsoleError from the outer scope instead of creating a new one.

Apply this fix:

 it('logs error to console when an error occurs in checkMarkdownFiles', async () => {
     const invalidFolderPath = path.join(tempDir, 'non-existent-folder');
-    
     await checkMarkdownFiles(invalidFolderPath, validateBlogs);
-    
     expect(mockConsoleError.mock.calls[0][0]).toContain('Error processing files:');
 });
📝 Committable suggestion

‼️ IMPORTANT
Carefully review the code before committing. Ensure that it accurately replaces the highlighted code, contains no missing lines, and has no issues with indentation. Thoroughly test & benchmark the code to ensure it meets the requirements.

Suggested change
it('logs error to console when an error occurs in checkMarkdownFiles', async () => {
const invalidFolderPath = path.join(tempDir, 'non-existent-folder');
await checkMarkdownFiles(invalidFolderPath, validateBlogs);
expect(mockConsoleError.mock.calls[0][0]).toContain('Error processing files:');
});
it('logs error to console when an error occurs in checkMarkdownFiles', async () => {
const invalidFolderPath = path.join(tempDir, 'non-existent-folder');
await checkMarkdownFiles(invalidFolderPath, validateBlogs);
expect(mockConsoleError.mock.calls[0][0]).toContain('Error processing files:');
});
🧰 Tools
🪛 eslint

[error] 75-75: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 76-76: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 77-77: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 78-78: Replace ········ with ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 79-79: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 80-80: Delete ····

(prettier/prettier)


[error] 81-81: Delete ··

(prettier/prettier)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants