chore: ATOM1 -> ATONE

Signed-off-by: moul <94029+moul@users.noreply.github.com>

COMPENDIUM.md

@@ -16,8 +16,8 @@ Its purpose is multi-fold:
 | [<ins>#7: Decentralists Party and AtomOne Hub Governance</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/11)    | jaekwon              | Discussion on distinct governance for the Decentralists party and AtomOne hub. Suggestions for limiting Decentralists' control.                     |
 | [<ins>#8: Defining "Foster Diversity and Alignment"</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/10)         | moul                 | Need for a clear definition of fostering diversity and alignment. Emphasis on open dialogue among competing groups.                                 |
 | [<ins>#10: Money as Tokenized Trust</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/12)                         | irreverentsimplicity | Money as a medium of social cooperation and trust. Concept of soft forks and trust as primary value in monetary systems.                            |
-| [<ins>#12: ATOM vs ATOM1 Integration & Genesis Distribution</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/13) | jaekwon              | Strategic approach to integration and distribution between ATOM and ATOM1. Models for effective integration.                                        |
-| [<ins>#13: Include stATOM Holders in ATOM1</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/14)                  | asalzmann            | Proposal to include stATOM holders in ATOM1 genesis or airdrop. Discussion on the treatment of stATOM holders.                                          |
+| [<ins>#12: ATOM vs ATONE Integration & Genesis Distribution</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/13) | jaekwon              | Strategic approach to integration and distribution between ATOM and ATOM1. Models for effective integration.                                        |
+| [<ins>#13: Include stATOM Holders in ATONE</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/14)                  | asalzmann            | Proposal to include stATOM holders in ATOM1 genesis or airdrop. Discussion on the treatment of stATOM holders.                                          |
 | [<ins>#16: Fix Cosmos Hub Failures</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/16)                          | COverS8              | Addressing centralization of voting power in Cosmos Hub. Proposal for snapshot and distribution for AtomOne airdrop.                                |
 | [<ins>#14: Brand Identity and Twitter Handle</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/15)                | wnmnsr               | Discussion on the brand identity and @_atomone Twitter handle. Proposal for a new symbol representative of an atom.                                 |
 | [<ins>#17: Choosing the Genesis Software Target</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/17)             | moul                 | Discussion on starting with Tendermint 2 or forking from Cosmos Hub 4. Trade-offs between early start and required work.                            |
@@ -113,28 +113,28 @@ tokenized trust, examining its role in social cooperation and value perception.
 - Collective trust in money's tokenized form impacts its value and community trust.
 - Discussions include soft forking in financial ecosystems and trust's role in governance.
 
-### ATOM vs ATOM1 Integration & Genesis Distribution
+### ATOM vs ATONE Integration & Genesis Distribution
 
 [<ins>Issue #12</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/12) aims to address 
-integrating ATOM and ATOM1, focusing on distribution and slashing mechanisms for ATOM1.
+integrating ATOM and ATONE, focusing on distribution and slashing mechanisms for ATOM1.
 
 #### Key points
 
-- Slashing in ATOM1 is necessary to enhance security decision-making intelligence.
+- Slashing in ATONE is necessary to enhance security decision-making intelligence.
 - Debates on penalizing or rewarding ATOM holders based on proposal voting.
-- Various methods for ATOM1 distribution and integration are considered.
+- Various methods for ATONE distribution and integration are considered.
 - Trust and governance vulnerability in tokenized money reliance.
 
-### Include stATOM Holders in ATOM1
+### Include stATOM Holders in ATONE
 
 [<ins>Issue #13</ins>](https://github.com/atomone-hub/genesis/issues/13) considers including 
-stATOM holders in the ATOM1 genesis file or airdrop.
+stATOM holders in the ATONE genesis file or airdrop.
 
 #### Key points
 
-- Potential inclusion of stATOM holders in ATOM1 genesis or airdrop.
+- Potential inclusion of stATOM holders in ATONE genesis or airdrop.
 - Debate on the treatment of stATOM holders about governance participation.
-- Distribution methods for ATOM1 to stATOM holders.
+- Distribution methods for ATONE to stATOM holders.
 
 ### Community Pool Financial Model
 
@@ -156,8 +156,8 @@ design and functionality of the $PHOTON token system.
 #### Key points:
 
 - Discussion on PHOTON not providing governance rights, except for specific PHOTON-related proposals.
-- Auto-staking of underlying ATOM1s linked to PHOTON and challenges in rebalancing voting power.
-- Proposal for a tax mechanism on auto-staked ATOM1s and auto-compounding of underlying assets.
+- Auto-staking of underlying ATONEs linked to PHOTON and challenges in rebalancing voting power.
+- Proposal for a tax mechanism on auto-staked ATONEs and auto-compounding of underlying assets.
 - The total supply cap for PHOTON is set at 1 Billion, with specific conversion formulae for
   bonding and unbonding.
 - Examination of bonding dynamics, including incentives and impacts of slashing events.

CONSTITUTION.md

@@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ pursuing such a dream.
 The best part is we've done most of the work already. With minimal ICS the
 simple-transfer-zones are already more or less done. We're 90% done with
 massive scale MVP, and after that scaling will be relatively easy. AND this
-ATOM1 hub is a minimal hub that zones will want to use. The product market fit
+ATONE hub is a minimal hub that zones will want to use. The product market fit
 is already there. It's simple, and we are already positioned for it. It is
 neutral to application zones that provide more functionality than token
 transfers.
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@ Cosmos is the VISA network built upon this decentralized BFT mainframe system.
 Always was, and should remain.
 
 New functionality can always be permissionlessly added on top of this base
-ATOM1 framework. The gno.land prop69 #exitdrop is a demonstration of value-add
+ATONE framework. The gno.land prop69 #exitdrop is a demonstration of value-add
 to the Cosmos Hub, as it will provide Gnolang smart contracts while IBC pegging
 to the Cosmos Hub for tokens.
 
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@ protected by this regulatory system in the case of theft. Perhaps accounts can
 opt out of this transfer-delay protection.
 
 The above minimal regulatory system still begs for a full system of checks and
-balances. That's another rabbit hole for another issue/document. The ATOM1
+balances. That's another rabbit hole for another issue/document. The ATONE
 constitution hints at a system of checks and balances, but IMO it isn't
 complete yet, at least not in its current written form.
 

DECENTRALISTS.md

@@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ Decentralists:
  * Require constitutions and bylaws.
  * Create rather than destroy.
 
-It is important to note that AtomOne is a proof-of-stake hub governed by $ATOM1
+It is important to note that AtomOne is a proof-of-stake hub governed by $ATONE
 tokens, while the Decentralists is a membership oriented quasi-political party
 with members associated with various companies (or individual proprietors). The
 various missions and objectives of this party may eventually drift from the
@@ -43,14 +43,14 @@ type of group or DAO) to replace the Decentralists at that time with the same
 system but with a new criteria for membership, under a new name.
 
 Initially the only criteria for Decentralists membership is that members hold
-any nonzero amount of $ATOM1 or $phATOM\* tokens (more on $phATOM later) and
+any nonzero amount of $ATONE or $phATOM\* tokens (more on $phATOM later) and
 agree with the spirit of the Founding Documents, and agree to at all times
 abide by and enforce the living AtomOne Constitution for the AtomOne hub.
 
 While we respect the stakers and the staking distribution, we also recognize
 that the unequal token distribution must be balanced by the natural inalienable
 God given powers to individual humans who are vital to make this project
-succeed. While the voting on AtomOne is handled solely by the $ATOM1 stakers,
+succeed. While the voting on AtomOne is handled solely by the $ATONE stakers,
 the Decentralists self-organize as a whole and with groups within, and every
 proposal in the governance of the Gaia and AtomOne hubs as well as every open
 group are enriched with the best arguments from both sides of the isle as
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ attacks).
    Documents linked to from here, and make payments for these purposes from an
    internal Decentralists Treasury separate from the AtomOne community pool,
    and conduct releases according to the roadmap specified here and other
-   Founding documents with oversight by the $ATOM1 stakers.
+   Founding documents with oversight by the $ATONE stakers.
 
 AtomOne will subsidize at least one ICS shard if needed, to serve as the zone
 for the Decentralists' dapp/DAO needs, including hosting a dapp for