We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
For most datasets I have tested audbcards.Dataset.publication_owner it works as expected.
audbcards.Dataset.publication_owner
But for crema-d it behaves strange:
crema-d
>>> import audbackend >>> audbackend.__version__ '2.0.1' >>> backend = audbackend.backend.Artifactory('https://audeering.jfrog.io/artifactory', 'data-public') >>> maven = audbackend.interface.Maven(backend) >>> # Expected owner >>> with backend: ... print(maven.owner("/crema-d/db.yaml", "1.3.0")) audeering >>> import audeer >>> cache_root = audeer.path("cache") >>> audeer.rmdir(cache_root) >>> _ = audeer.mkdir(cache_root) >>> import audbcards >>> audbcards.__version__ '0.2.0' >>> ds = audbcards.Dataset("crema-d", "1.3.0", cache_root=cache_root) >>> ds.publication_owner '_system_'
Even though the code executed by audbcards.Dataset.publication_owner is identical to what I did above using audbackend:
audbackend
audbcards/audbcards/core/dataset.py
Lines 286 to 291 in 75e27c5
/cc @ChristianGeng
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
The issue exists only for our public repository, not for our internal repositories.
Sorry, something went wrong.
No branches or pull requests
For most datasets I have tested
audbcards.Dataset.publication_owner
it works as expected.But for
crema-d
it behaves strange:Even though the code executed by
audbcards.Dataset.publication_owner
is identical to what I did above usingaudbackend
:audbcards/audbcards/core/dataset.py
Lines 286 to 291 in 75e27c5
/cc @ChristianGeng
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: