Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: Add Semantic Splitter #72

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 4, 2024
Merged

feat: Add Semantic Splitter #72

merged 3 commits into from
Jan 4, 2024

Conversation

ashraq1455
Copy link
Contributor

@ashraq1455 ashraq1455 commented Jan 4, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 4, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (412d74c) 86.52% compared to head (dd2b575) 87.31%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #72      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   86.52%   87.31%   +0.79%     
==========================================
  Files          15       16       +1     
  Lines         638      678      +40     
==========================================
+ Hits          552      592      +40     
  Misses         86       86              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@jamescalam jamescalam changed the title Add Semantic Splitter feat: Add Semantic Splitter Jan 4, 2024
Copy link
Member

@jamescalam jamescalam left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

awesome @ashraq1455 🔥

@jamescalam jamescalam merged commit 3f9c384 into main Jan 4, 2024
5 of 6 checks passed
@jamescalam jamescalam deleted the ashraq/semantic-splitter branch January 4, 2024 23:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants