Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat: add function to return wNEAR address #807

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Aug 2, 2023

Conversation

aleksuss
Copy link
Member

Description

The PR adds a function for returning factory wNEAR address in borsh format.

@aleksuss aleksuss requested review from mrLSD and birchmd July 28, 2023 14:48
@aleksuss aleksuss force-pushed the feat/aleksuss/return_wnear_addr branch from 0ed28c4 to 1ba9a0a Compare July 28, 2023 14:49
engine/src/lib.rs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@joshuajbouw joshuajbouw added this pull request to the merge queue Aug 2, 2023
Merged via the queue into develop with commit 5f5da87 Aug 2, 2023
20 checks passed
@joshuajbouw joshuajbouw deleted the feat/aleksuss/return_wnear_addr branch August 2, 2023 13:01
aleksuss added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
## Description

The PR adds a function for returning factory wNEAR address in borsh
format.
@aleksuss aleksuss mentioned this pull request Aug 10, 2023
aleksuss added a commit that referenced this pull request Aug 10, 2023
### Changes

- Added a view transaction `factory_get_wnear_address` for returning
address for the `wNEAR` ERC-20 contract by [@aleksuss]. ([#807])

### Fixes

- Fixed a bug where standalone engine can crash on tracing transactions
with too large contract deployment by [@birchmd]. ([#817])
- Fixed a bug and performance improvements with unusual exponents in the
`engine-modexp` crate by [@guidovranken]. ([#814])

---------

Co-authored-by: Guido Vranken <guidovranken@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Michael Birch <michael.birch@aurora.dev>
Co-authored-by: Joshua J. Bouw <joshua@aurora.dev>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants