Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(pacmak): update Python dependency typeguard to more modern version #4455

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

iwanbolzern
Copy link

Updated Python typeguard dependency to reasonable new version.


By submitting this pull request, I confirm that my contribution is made under the terms of the Apache 2.0 license.

@iwanbolzern iwanbolzern changed the title Updated typeguard to reasonable version feat: Updated Python typeguard version Mar 14, 2024
@iwanbolzern
Copy link
Author

Dear jsii maintainers,

Any chance that we can get this merged soon?

Thank you and all the best,
Iwan

@mrgrain mrgrain changed the title feat: Updated Python typeguard version feat(pacmak): update Python dependency typeguard to more modern version Mar 25, 2024
@mrgrain
Copy link
Contributor

mrgrain commented Mar 25, 2024

Thanks for raising the PR. This will needs an update to the snapshot tests.

@sam-goodwin
Copy link

sam-goodwin commented Mar 30, 2024

Oh cool, good to see this in progress. Thanks @iwanbolzern.

I opened an Issue for this just yesterday, didn't see the PR.

This will take more than just upgrading the version. The generated code needs to change. I did some monkey patch experiments.

See: #4469

@sam-goodwin
Copy link

Have opened a PR that updates the generated code and updates the snapshot tests: #4470

@iwanbolzern
Copy link
Author

Thanks @sam-goodwin for looking into this! I'm going to close this PR in favor of yours.

@iwanbolzern iwanbolzern closed this Apr 1, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants