Replies: 2 comments 1 reply
-
Hey man, it's great to see action again around the project!
You're going super fast with the improvements for 2.0, kudos!
Besides RTE/SRTE happy to chime in with getting 2.0 out of course.
I'll have a bit of time available in the coming months, happy to help where
I can
Brandon Blaylock ***@***.***> ezt írta (időpont: 2022. szept.
17., Szo, 21:59):
… @baoshan <https://github.com/baoshan> and @pixeleet
<https://github.com/pixeleet> I just realized that I started working
through the 2.0 stuff without asking if you guys wanted to be involved! Are
either of you interested in picking up some of the work? Admittedly, most
of it is pretty slog-like. Formatting, checking for missing
implementations, writing tests, and slow slow slow documentation. But if
you're interested let me know how much you'd like (or just assign stuff to
yourself if you want) and I'll pass it your way.
Additionally, do you guys have any interest in doing code reviews on the
PRs that I am making? Right no I'm pretty confident of tests and coverage
picking up most errors but extra eyes are always good. Are either of you
interested in doing reviews? If so I'll stop merging after the github
actions pass and wait for a review.
Thanks for the contributions you guys have already made and I hope to see
more from both of you :D
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#155>, or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABMCMZIQBUEGM2AKTVV33XLV6YPLJANCNFSM6AAAAAAQPEIWJU>
.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.Message ID:
***@***.***>
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
1 reply
-
Hey Brandon,
Great to hear from you buddy, how is the merry potter life? :)
I’m currently mostly using effect-ts, needed to go back to node land for a moment.
I am no longer pursuing FAE in it’s current form.
I would be very interested though in implementing a platform-deno for Effect
https://github.com/effect-ts/platform
Drop me a line somewhere if you wanna catch up :)
… On 28 Oct 2023, at 06:53, Brandon Blaylock ***@***.***> wrote:
Heya @pixeleet <https://github.com/pixeleet>, are you still interested in implementing FnAsyncEither and StateFnAsyncEither?
—
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#155 (reply in thread)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABMCMZJU5WZ2EMPSR5PBWIDYBSFUZAVCNFSM6AAAAAAQPEIWJWVHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43SRDJONRXK43TNFXW4Q3PNVWWK3TUHM3TIMBZGE3DK>.
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
|
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
-
@baoshan and @pixeleet I just realized that I started working through the 2.0 stuff without asking if you guys wanted to be involved! Are either of you interested in picking up some of the work? Admittedly, most of it is pretty slog-like. Formatting, checking for missing implementations, writing tests, and slow slow slow documentation. But if you're interested let me know how much you'd like (or just assign stuff to yourself if you want) and I'll pass it your way.
Additionally, do you guys have any interest in doing code reviews on the PRs that I am making? Right no I'm pretty confident of tests and coverage picking up most errors but extra eyes are always good. Are either of you interested in doing reviews? If so I'll stop merging after the github actions pass and wait for a review.
Thanks for the contributions you guys have already made and I hope to see more from both of you :D
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
All reactions