-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 242
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Bazel CI] [ IOException]no such package '@@glib//' error with Bazel@HEAD #1201
Comments
This is a flake due to an outage of the upstream gnome download servers - the URL seems to be happy now so I suspect this will go away on the next CI run.. |
@jsharpe We are still seeing this error in downstream https://buildkite.com/bazel/bazel-at-head-plus-downstream/builds/3900#018fe16d-3dc9-4e18-b528-30382365b2b5 |
This seems to be an infra flake on gitlab.freedesktop.org this time which is different to the original issue. I guess this could be made more resilient if the packages in question are put on the bazel gcs mirror? @sgowroji do you have the bandwidth available to put those issue requests in on bazelbuild/bazel and place a PR on this repo to add the mirrored urls? |
@jsharpe Could you please file an issue under mirror request. I can update there. Thanks for looking into it. |
@sgowroji I know how to request it - I'm asking if you have bandwidth to do this as I don't currently have time to do this for all the URLs that need mirroring that aren't yet in this repo as I know there are a few, its not just the one that is listed in this issue. |
Sorry am not sure about the list of URL's. CC @meteorcloudy Could you please guide on this mirror links. |
@jsharpe This is beyond the responsibility of our gTech operational team. If you can get the list of URLs to mirror, they can help that. But the team doesn't have the expertise or bandwidth to dig into a specific project. |
@meteorcloudy the effort is in extracting the list of URLs to mirror, and then adding in the mirror configuration to this repo. I have no knowledge of the internal structure of the Google teams, nor their remit, is there any public documentation around this commitment and levels we should expect? The reality is this was a infrastructure flake from a third party server that caused an intermittent failure in bazel CI; really bazel CI should have a download cache / pull through proxy, not only to mitigate against such flakes but also to protect it against a large number of downloads / high bandwidth utilisation. It's also my understanding that at some point mirror.bazel.build will go away at which point the download cache would become more important and solve this issue? The bazel at head plus downstream is primarily an early warning of breaks in future bazel versions and given the very limited resource available to maintain this repo (my time is entirely voluntary and on my own time), I just don't have any bandwidth to address such issues, particularly as there seems to have been a higher than average number of breaking changes in the bazel 8 series, which in all cases for this repo have just been down to transitive dependencies of the examples which can take a not insignificant amount of time to track down, especially if you are unaware of the context of the changes in bazel HEAD (e.g. the aar_import failure in #1203). |
I have opened #1214 but I have no intention of spending anytime fixing this unless someone wants to sponsor me to do so. |
CI: https://buildkite.com/bazel/bazel-at-head-plus-downstream/builds/3856#018f7548-3f1d-4293-8931-28b75d5d2372
Platform: Ubuntu
Logs:
Steps:
CC Greenteam @fweikert
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: