-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 3.3k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
flash bump #9088
flash bump #9088
Conversation
mictadlo
commented
May 30, 2018
- I have read the guidelines for bioconda recipes.
- This PR adds a new recipe.
- AFAIK, this recipe is directly relevant to the biological sciences (otherwise, please submit to the more general purpose conda-forge channel).
- This PR updates an existing recipe.
- This PR does something else (explain below).
|
||
extra: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why have you removed this? its still the same tool isn't it?
Is there a publication which we can reference?
version: {{ version }} | ||
|
||
build: | ||
number: 1 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
start with 0
I’m uncertain as to the status of how FLASH2 relates to FLASH. Looking at the GitHub repository, it seems that the project is an independent one (not from the original authors). Perhaps @dstreett could explain? According to dstreett/FLASH2#2, the behavior is also slightly different, so perhaps it woud be an idea to put this into a separate recipe named |
It it is really a separate "tool" than a new recipe would be preferred, I agree. |
I created a new PR #9103 |