You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An alternative to #17 is to deliver each of the blocks that are prototyped in oik-blocks as part of the plugin to which they apply.
Proposed solution
Similar to how it’s done for core and WooCommerce blocks.
New blocks would be developed in oik-blocks and released to the target plugin once past the experimentation stage.
Blocks may be renamed in the target plugin.
E.g. oik-block/css would be delivered in oik-css and be called oik-css/css
Or retain the oik-block prefix; oik-block/googlemap, when delivered in oik, could continue to be called oik-block/googlemap.
We’ll have to cater for duplicate registration.
And support transforms between the prefixes.
Common logic would be delivered in a shared library files. Already prototyped for oik-css. It shouldn’t be necessary to have oik as a pre-requisite when it’s only the block part of the plugin that’s are being used.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
An alternative to #17 is to deliver each of the blocks that are prototyped in oik-blocks as part of the plugin to which they apply.
Proposed solution
Similar to how it’s done for core and WooCommerce blocks.
E.g.
oik-block/css
would be delivered inoik-css
and be calledoik-css/css
Or retain the
oik-block
prefix;oik-block/googlemap
, when delivered inoik
, could continue to be calledoik-block/googlemap
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: