-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 743
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Dealing with attic issues #5
Comments
I ticked all the stuff that's currently in borg master branch. There is some more stuff already fixed/improved that is not merged into there yet. I am also ticking the items now that I think should be closed (because duplicate, irrelevant, stale, not enough infos, ...). I'm also ticking the stuff that has own issues in the borg issue tracker. |
about jborg/attic#252 (fadvise DONTNEED): it is merged (and AFAICS using fadvise DONTNEED had positive effects). https://github.com/borgbackup/borg/blob/master/borg/_chunker.c#L160 People seem to disagree whether that is beneficial or not. |
about pull mode: it is ticked because we have an issue (which is a bit more general) in our issue tracker: #36 |
it would have been nice to clarify which tickets are resolved, in the issue tracker or ignored instead of just ticking them off here... now we don't clearly know what's what... |
@anarcat I see your point, but I also don't want to make it even more work. I mainly see the unchecked attic issues as stuff that has still to be looked at (and maybe dealt with), so that one does not have to go through all the issues there again and again. Of course we also need to deal with the issues in borg issue tracker. What's really fixed can be seen more easily in CHANGES.rst. |
yeah ok, just trying to fix #224 here :) |
jborg/attic#99 implemented through #248 |
jborg/attic#181 implemented through #247 |
After doing a large volume test myself (see #216) and not finding issues, I'll check these ones as "can't reproduce" now: |
Note: I put a checkmark in that (native) "windows support" attic issue. Not because we have native windows support (only cygwin), but because the related changesets there are rather messed up. |
jborg/attic#18 has been reopened in #315 |
jborg/attic#70 is 404 (huh? how can that happen?) but as we recently improved FUSE performance, I've just checked it as solved. |
i checked jborg/attic#367 in the list as we track this in #225. |
Hi so does that mean it is fixed/implemented but I am missing the docs or is it ticked by mistake? |
@pacman88 see #5 (comment) and #36 |
@anarcat: thx - and sorry for just skimming over the thread |
Hi, I'm unable to run info:
|
@pyrohh it's unclear what your issue is. sure open a new ticket and provide enough information so we can reproduce. |
@ThomasWaldmann I'll do that, and I meant to link to jborg/attic#317, not #317 in this repo. |
@pyrohh ah :) but i doubt it is same issue as that one as we do not use fcntl locking any more. |
False alarm, everything works after a reinstall... must have been the boogie man. Anyway, this is such a nice piece of software, thanks for working on it :D |
jborg/attic#103 checked, we have it now in ticket #661. |
checked attic 100, quite old and no response there. |
FYI, just noticed jborg/attic#219 is closed. |
@JensRantil yes, but in borg, we'll do aes-gcm, likely in borg 1.2. |
attic 120 is borg #1462. |
checked attic 227 - in PR #1371 rpc api for exclusive flag was added, so remote and local repos are now more similar in how they lock. also, the deadlock was fixed. |
checked attic 383 - can be solved with borg with-lock ... checked attic 384, out-of-scope / too special. |
attic 131 checked. It is a rather old ticket, the tracebacks do not contain enough information. Also, this issue is likely related to repository locking which is very different in borg (mkdir-based and since 1.0.7 immediately-exclusive) than in attic (posix locks, lock upgrades). |
Checked attic 387 - borg works on cygwin and there is an ongoing windows port in branch "windows". |
Checked attic 145, is locally tracked in #1695 now. |
attic 276 is now tracked locally in #1751. |
attic 195 is now tracked locally in #1783. |
attic 210 is implemented with Manifest.config and borg_security_dir. Maybe create a internals doc ticket there? from tw: yes that would be good, also for the changelog. |
attic 207 is long implemented in Borg :) The crypto stuff has it's own tickets (see above). from tw: some is implemented, some will (hopefully) come with 1.2. but yes, we can check it as we have local tickets. |
attic 182: fuse archives are cached via a tempfile in the page cache. Resolved? from tw: no, attic 182 is about a search index to optimize access to the right chunks. |
attic 117 resolved in attic (also: fuse versions view, fuse repository mount, borg diff). from tw: you mean "resolved in borg"? yes, fuse versions help, although it is not a general "file search" functionality. it only helps if you know the precise path. |
attic 110: better locking is now done, otherwise it's covered by #768 and the like from tw: ok, similar enough. |
attic 104 is tracked locally in #1406 from tw: ok |
attic 393 is handled by borg #2092. |
attic 395 checked - borg can be built with openssl 1.1. |
attic 386: I've opened #2415 to discuss this issue in the general case. |
remove remains of old website, redirect to RTD
I'm closing this now. If we are missing something important here in the borg issue tracker, please file an issue here (after checking we do not already have one for it). |
Here is a list of all open issues in attic, acquired with this dirty python script . I suggest we go through all of them and tick them when fixed.
Done / tracked here / invalid / out-of-scope:
undefined symbol: EVP_aes_256_ctr
error when runningattic
/opt/pkg
(pkgsrc OS X) for opensslcreate
flag to print backed up filesattic create
.pip install
on Ubuntu 14.04 failsSIGUSR1
in non-verbose modeThe text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: