Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RPC/API Improvements Tracking #1474

Closed
15 of 30 tasks
distractedm1nd opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Closed
15 of 30 tasks

RPC/API Improvements Tracking #1474

distractedm1nd opened this issue Dec 12, 2022 · 2 comments
Assignees
Labels

Comments

@distractedm1nd
Copy link
Collaborator

distractedm1nd commented Dec 12, 2022

RPC/Autogen

First stable version

Nice to haves

  • blob module
  • improve UX around generating auth token

Hardening

Gateway:

Refactorings:

General API endpoint improvements / feature requests

Future considerations

@Wondertan
Copy link
Member

Wondertan commented Apr 7, 2023

We must find a way to add options to our APIs for optional things like fee prices, versioning, etc.
The canonical way of using functional patterns would not be compatible with our RPC autogen. Though there might be a brilliant way to make the functional pattern work with reflection, but it's not known nor implemented in the RPC lib.

As a simple step, I propose adding an optional structure to each method, requiring an option. That structure would contain all the optional fields of the method. This way is compatible with our RPC lib and should be easy to replicate in different languages.

@ramin
Copy link
Contributor

ramin commented Jan 9, 2024

going to close this as a stale/general tracking issue and let the requisite linked issues that remain open track the work, so as we reduce issue count we can rely less on these kind of big issues

@ramin ramin closed this as completed Jan 9, 2024
@ramin ramin unpinned this issue Jan 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
No open projects
Archived in project
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants