Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Apr 15, 2024. It is now read-only.

chore: rename the codeowners contributor #689

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024
Merged

chore: rename the codeowners contributor #689

merged 2 commits into from
Feb 1, 2024

Conversation

rach-id
Copy link
Member

@rach-id rach-id commented Jan 18, 2024

Overview

Checklist

  • New and updated code has appropriate documentation
  • New and updated code has new and/or updated testing
  • Required CI checks are passing
  • Visual proof for any user facing features like CLI or documentation updates
  • Linked issues closed with keywords

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Chores
    • Updated global owners in the project's CODEOWNERS file.

@rach-id rach-id added the chore label Jan 18, 2024
@rach-id rach-id self-assigned this Jan 18, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 18, 2024

Walkthrough

This update signifies a shift in the team's global ownership roles within the project's GitHub repository. Specifically, it updates the .github/CODEOWNERS file to replace @SweeXordious with @rach-id alongside @evan-forbes, marking a transition in the project's core team members responsible for overseeing contributions and maintaining code quality.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
.github/CODEOWNERS Updated global owners to @evan-forbes @rach-id

🐇✨
Changes afoot in the codebase vast,
New guardians now, as time has passed.
From @SweeXordious to @rach-id we go,
Guiding the code, with wisdom in tow.
🌟🐾

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share

Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit-tests for this file.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit tests for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository from git and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit tests.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger a review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • The JSON schema for the configuration file is available here.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/coderabbit-overrides.v2.json

CodeRabbit Discord Community

Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.

@rach-id rach-id enabled auto-merge (squash) January 18, 2024 10:22
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Review Status

Actionable comments generated: 0

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Commits Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 7d6f745 and b73e7e9.
Files selected for processing (1)
  • .github/CODEOWNERS (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 1
.github/CODEOWNERS (1)
  • 12-12: The update to the global code owners list, replacing @SweeXordious with @rach-id while retaining @evan-forbes, is correctly implemented according to the .github/CODEOWNERS file syntax and the PR objectives. This change ensures that the right individuals are notified for reviews on future PRs, reflecting the current project responsibilities or team composition.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Comparison is base (7d6f745) 24.38% compared to head (b73e7e9) 24.38%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main     #689   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   24.38%   24.38%           
=======================================
  Files          29       29           
  Lines        3227     3227           
=======================================
  Hits          787      787           
  Misses       2343     2343           
  Partials       97       97           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@rach-id rach-id merged commit a702099 into main Feb 1, 2024
18 checks passed
@rach-id rach-id deleted the rach-id-patch-1 branch February 1, 2024 22:43
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants