CGP-131 #411
CGP-131 #411
Conversation
Co-authored-by: Martín Volpe <volpe@clabs.co>
Co-authored-by: Martín Volpe <volpe@clabs.co>
|
@martinvol CGP 127 is already taken by another proposal made by you the USDC proposal. Please change this one to 128 to be able to merge it. |
|
@martinvol CGP 128 is already taken by another proposal made by you the USDT proposal. |
…rnance into pahor/updateDelegateeCount
…rnance into pahor/updateDelegateeCount
| status: DRAFT | ||
| discussions-to: https://forum.celo.org/t/celo-protocol-upgrades-gingerbread-hard-fork-and-contracts-release-10/6612 | ||
| governance-proposal-id: 170 | ||
| date-executed: 2050-01-01 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Despite the many new checks, people keep finding creative ways to submit invalid data. @martinvol if the status is draft, then the date-executed cannot be anything but empty, since it refers to the date that the proposal gets executed on chain. Whatever that date is, it's certainly not 2050-01-01
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Making sure proposals shouldn't have formatting errors should be responsability of the editors, they approved and merged the change
No description provided.