Fix glibc vs. musl article link (#1812)

https://edu.chainguard.dev/chainguard/chainguard-images/working-with-images/images-compiled-programs/compiled-programs/#what-about-musl

content/chainguard/chainguard-images/working-with-images/images-compiled-programs/compiled-programs.md

@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@ You can find the complete inventory of packages for the `glibc-openssl` Chaingua
 
 At the time of this writing, no Chainguard Images come packaged with `musl`. Chainguard builds `glibc`-based images because `glibc` is commonly used, which makes it easier for most developers to start consuming Chainguard Images in their environments. Additionally, `glibc` is widely tested, making it a dependable choice for a C standard library implementation. As `glibc` is a well-established option, choosing to use `glibc` ensures more applications will be compatible with new images.
 
-Though `musl` is sometimes chosen because of its minimal footprint, Chainguard’s distroless approach based on [Wolfi](https://www.chainguard.dev/unchained/introducing-wolfi-the-first-linux-un-distro) often results in a container image of comparable (or smaller) size than official `musl` based images. For more information, please refer to our [glibc vs. musl](/chainguard/chainguard-images/working-with-images/compiled-programs/glibc-vs-musl) article. 
+Though `musl` is sometimes chosen because of its minimal footprint, Chainguard’s distroless approach based on [Wolfi](https://www.chainguard.dev/unchained/introducing-wolfi-the-first-linux-un-distro) often results in a container image of comparable (or smaller) size than official `musl` based images. For more information, please refer to our [glibc vs. musl](/chainguard/chainguard-images/working-with-images/images-compiled-programs/glibc-vs-musl) article. 
 
 ## Next Steps