Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added has_byte_opcode member to every table #28

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 2, 2025

Conversation

cheng-alvin
Copy link
Owner

Since the introduction of the has_byte_opcode member in the instr_encode_table struct in #21, basically no instruction encode table actually uses this member of the struct; casuing mis- interpretation and usage of this member in other functions and modules. This pull has added this boolean value to most instruction encoder tables, in order to support functions and conditionals that depend of this member exisiting.

Since the introduction of the `has_byte_opcode` member in the
`instr_encode_table` struct in #21, basically no instruction encode
table *actually* uses this member of the struct; casuing mis-
interpretation and usage of this member in other functions
and modules. This pull has added this boolean value to *most*
instruction encoder tables, in order to support functions and
conditionals that depend of this member exisiting.
@cheng-alvin cheng-alvin added bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request patch Small and minor patch labels Jan 2, 2025
@cheng-alvin cheng-alvin merged commit fe76a42 into main Jan 2, 2025
4 checks passed
@cheng-alvin cheng-alvin deleted the add-has-byte-opcode branch January 2, 2025 04:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working enhancement New feature or request patch Small and minor patch
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant