You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
When looking at various static files on the site, none appear to have any indication of being served via CDN (no x-cache-*, no via, no .cloudfront url, etc)
Also looking at the whois data, there appears to be at least some hint that this is an ec2 instance serving static files, which probably does not fall into our "has a CDN" category.
What do you think?
Motivation and context
Accuracy of reported output is important to me, and I'm not sure if there is a change to how such a site should be classified.
Implementation notes
Unsure
Acceptance criteria
Unsure
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
S4lt5
changed the title
Possible miscategorizing of AWS EC2 Users
Possible miscategorizing of AWS EC2 Sites
Oct 27, 2022
S4lt5
changed the title
Possible miscategorizing of AWS EC2 Sites
Possible miscategorizing of aws-hosted sites
Oct 27, 2022
This is a good idea to fix. The classification of Cloudfront domains should be more accurate than to just assume all AWS hosted sites use Cloudfront. Stashing this in a TODO for now.
Adds anything that has amazonaws.com in the name to see it as an "Amazon AWS" CDN which realistically is not fully correct as you mention above. I think a lot of the other domains in this list suffer from this.
For example, something ending in .discord.com does not mean it was specifically hosted on cdn.discord.com.
💡 Summary
When running findcdn against a site like www.ahcp.gov, I get the following output:
❯ findcdn list www.achp.gov
I also put some debug prints in to see the following values:
When looking at various static files on the site, none appear to have any indication of being served via CDN (no x-cache-*, no via, no .cloudfront url, etc)
Also looking at the whois data, there appears to be at least some hint that this is an ec2 instance serving static files, which probably does not fall into our "has a CDN" category.
What do you think?
Motivation and context
Accuracy of reported output is important to me, and I'm not sure if there is a change to how such a site should be classified.
Implementation notes
Unsure
Acceptance criteria
Unsure
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: