Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

lagging on number input field and added a radio button #171

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 31, 2023

Conversation

sohail0992
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

@github-actions
Copy link

PR Analysis

  • 🎯 Main theme: This PR seems to be focused on improving the user interface and user experience of a form in a Dart application. The changes include modifications to dialog boxes, form fields, and validation logic.
  • 📝 PR summary: The PR introduces several changes to the form handling and user interface in a Dart application. It modifies the behavior of dialog boxes, adds a readOnly property to form fields, and adjusts the validation logic. It also appears to address an issue with lagging on number input fields.
  • 📌 Type of PR: Enhancement
  • 🧪 Relevant tests added: No
  • ⏱️ Estimated effort to review [1-5]: 3, because the PR involves changes in multiple areas of the codebase, including UI, form handling, and validation logic. However, the changes are relatively straightforward and do not involve complex logic or algorithms.
  • 🔒 Security concerns: No security concerns found

PR Feedback

  • 💡 General suggestions: The PR generally looks good, but it would be beneficial to include some tests to ensure that the new changes work as expected and do not introduce any regressions. Additionally, it would be helpful to have a more detailed PR description explaining the motivation behind the changes and how they improve the application.

  • 🤖 Code feedback:

    • relevant file: lib/hcai_form.dart
      suggestion: Consider refactoring the _showDialog function to make it more intuitive. The function currently takes in multiple boolean flags that control its behavior, which can be confusing. Instead, you could define an options object or use different functions for different dialog types. [medium]
      relevant line: _showDialog(context, "Information", helpLabelText, false, false, false);

    • relevant file: lib/hcai_form.dart
      suggestion: It seems like the readOnly property is being added to multiple widgets. Consider creating a custom widget that includes this property to avoid code duplication. [medium]
      relevant line: readOnly: field['readOnly'] ?? false,

    • relevant file: lib/utils/helper.dart
      suggestion: The getMask function has been commented out. If this function is no longer needed, consider removing it completely to keep the codebase clean. [medium]
      relevant line: // inputFormatters: Helper.getMask(maskType),

    • relevant file: lib/utils/validation.dart
      suggestion: The validation logic has been extended with a new 'nin' criteria. Make sure to update the function's documentation to reflect this change. [important]
      relevant line: } else if (criteria == 'in' || criteria == 'and' || criteria == 'nin') {

How to use

To invoke the PR-Agent, add a comment using one of the following commands:
/review [-i]: Request a review of your Pull Request. For an incremental review, which only considers changes since the last review, include the '-i' option.
/describe: Modify the PR title and description based on the contents of the PR.
/improve [--extended]: Suggest improvements to the code in the PR. Extended mode employs several calls, and provides a more thorough feedback.
/ask <QUESTION>: Pose a question about the PR.
/update_changelog: Update the changelog based on the PR's contents.

To edit any configuration parameter from configuration.toml, add --config_path=new_value
For example: /review --pr_reviewer.extra_instructions="focus on the file: ..."
To list the possible configuration parameters, use the /config command.

@mubassirhayat mubassirhayat merged commit 098b677 into master Oct 31, 2023
1 check passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants