You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I want to assign scl-resources to different locations
So that I can reduce the relevant scl-resources to a single location, group them accordingly and get a better overview
Acceptance criteria
An user can assign/remove single scl-resources to/from a location. For easier management an user can search for scl-resources and so facilitate the search trough all resources before assigning a resource. Resources can be filtered easily by location.
Locations can be managed via Plugin as well as taken from SCL-Files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
"scl-resource" is like a synonym to SCL-Files so that all kind of scl-files will be assignable to locations.
What I wanted to ask is if "location" is the proper naming or "project" be a more better fitting naming in a more general way? Depends a lot on your opinion how to name it. For TSO's of course, location is also a good fit. Just let me know
User Story
As a user
I want to assign scl-resources to different locations
So that I can reduce the relevant scl-resources to a single location, group them accordingly and get a better overview
Acceptance criteria
An user can assign/remove single scl-resources to/from a location. For easier management an user can search for scl-resources and so facilitate the search trough all resources before assigning a resource. Resources can be filtered easily by location.
Locations can be managed via Plugin as well as taken from SCL-Files.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: