sagelib v10.3 #174
sagelib v10.3 #174
Conversation
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.03.19.15.37.47
regro-cf-autotick-bot
requested review from
alexjbest,
isuruf and
saraedum
as code owners
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
|
It's maybe a good idea to use this opportunity to simplify the build script somewhat to what Arch does, sagemath/sage#36860 (comment) |
we do not need the latest versions of these
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.04.19.07.35.32
|
@conda-forge-admin, please rerender |
…nda-forge-pinning 2024.04.19.07.35.32
arb is now part of FLINT
pip seems to require sage-conf which we do not want to install
This comment was marked as outdated.
This comment was marked as outdated.
|
Hi! This is the friendly automated conda-forge-linting service. I just wanted to let you know that I linted all conda-recipes in your PR ( |
not sure why the global numpy pin is not picked up here (in the outputs.) Anyway, the build script searches for numpy to add it so some search path. If it's not found, it does nothing, so it is probably not to add numpy.
This reverts commit 4e04e04.
This reverts commit 6c286d3.
The error
setuptools.sandbox.UnpickleableException: DistutilsSetupError("each element of 'ext_modules' option must be an Extension instance or 2-tuple")
seems to be caused by a conflict between setuptools and distutils.
It's unclear why that error shows up but maybe dropping distutils here
helps.
This reverts commit c9c5d10.
and hopefully fix macOS build errors of sagemath-bliss and sagemath-sirocco.
|
@isuruf, there are a lot of warnings of the kind: Is that anything to worry about? |
|
Also, I'm a bit surprised about this bit at the end of |
This comment was marked as resolved.
This comment was marked as resolved.
Whenever I saw that error before as a user I ended up with a subtly broken install of sage, so this does seem a bit worrying to me! |
|
Does sage compile pyc files on first start manually? |
I don't know. There's some weird stuff in the startup like a function that caches the result of There's no reference to |
|
Since we seem to have no idea what's going on here, shall we just merge and test? Any objections @isuruf, @alexjbest ? |
|
I'll just merge this then. If we find problems, we'll fix them later. |
Also fixes #172.
TODO
run_exports.Dependencies
gmp6.3.0,mpc1.3.1,mpfr4.2.1,mpfrcx0.6.3,gmpy22.2.0a1 sagemath/sage#36351; 2.1.5 should work alright, seegmp6.3.0,mpc1.3.1,mpfr4.2.1,mpfrcx0.6.3,gmpy22.2.0a1 sagemath/sage#36351 (comment)