-
I may be missing something, but I've been struggling to find clear directions for how best to populate the
but I immediately encounter an error with the following (truncated) traceback.
This is unsurprising to me, because the shape of the dl1 image I'm working with will be Am I doing this at all right? Is this a bug? Any help would be appreciated. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Replies: 1 comment
-
Hi @cbadams2 , Thanks for your interest in using the calibration code in ctapipe. Before I answer what you need to do to fix the exception you mentioned, let me say that this part of the code is relatively old, mostly untested and has significantly changed downstream in the only place we know it has been used, the calibration code for LST-1. It is currently being rewritten, and we are making progress in doing so, see recent PRs: #2554, #2604, #2609 and the discussions there-in. The final step of actually computing the calibration coefficients will probably not be in ctapipe itself, at least not for some time, but in the codebase of the CTAO calibpipe, which is under development here: That being said, you encountered a bug that I think stems from recent changes of the expected waveform shape we made in #2529 So I'll transfer this from discussions to issues. |
Beta Was this translation helpful? Give feedback.
Hi @cbadams2 ,
Thanks for your interest in using the calibration code in ctapipe.
Before I answer what you need to do to fix the exception you mentioned, let me say that this part of the code is relatively old, mostly untested and has significantly changed downstream in the only place we know it has been used, the calibration code for LST-1.
It is currently being rewritten, and we are making progress in doing so, see recent PRs:
#2554, #2604, #2609 and the discussions there-in.
The final step of actually computing the calibration coefficients will probably not be in ctapipe itself, at least not for some time, but in the codebase of the CTAO calibpipe, which is under development here:
http…