Update 2023-08-27-jcheminf-reproducibility-pilot.md

_posts/2023-08-27-jcheminf-reproducibility-pilot.md

@@ -113,9 +113,9 @@ For posterity, this review has also been included on https://github.com/Macau-LY
 The example above isn't so great - it's possible that these authors have never considered most of these points
 about reproducibility before. The reality is that many computational scientists are not trained in this since their
 mentors were not primarily trained as computational scientists themselves. Combine with the perverse incentive
-structure, it's understandable how this can be left out from some publications. I experienced something similar in my
+structure in academia, it's understandable how this can be left out from some publications. I experienced something similar in my
 doctoral studies, and had to bootstrap my own philosophy on reproducibility as well as the practical skills to achieve
-it.
+it. I also understand not everyone is in the position where the have the flexibility/freedom/initiative to do this.
 
 That all being said, we are now entering an era where progressive and newly minted PIs actually have training as
 computational scientists. The next paper in my queue for a reproducibility review is for