Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Displayed formula does not match new ATL syntax #227

Closed
NicEastvillage opened this issue Sep 26, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #229
Closed

Displayed formula does not match new ATL syntax #227

NicEastvillage opened this issue Sep 26, 2023 · 0 comments · Fixed by #229
Labels
bug Something isn't working good first issue Good for newcomers

Comments

@NicEastvillage
Copy link
Contributor

When model checking, CGAAL prints what ATL property it is checking before it begins:

$ .\target\debug\cgaal.exe check .\lcgs-examples\robot_grid\robot_grid_N3.lcgs .\lcgs-examples\robot_grid\everyone_starts_home_TRUE.atl                  
Checking the formula: (((r1.at_start & r2.at_start) & r3.at_start) & r4.at_start)
Time elapsed model checking: 85ms (85ms 909us 700ns)
Model satisfies formula: true

However, since #216 conjunction and disjunction uses && and || respectively. As seen in the output above, printed ATL formulae still uses the old & and |.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
bug Something isn't working good first issue Good for newcomers
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant