Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

training and testing as README introduced, but got a bad accuracy on provided evaluation dataset. What may cause that? #113

Open
SharonJin422 opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 1 comment
Open

training and testing as README introduced, but got a bad accuracy on provided evaluation dataset. What may cause that? #113

SharonJin422 opened this issue Jul 29, 2021 · 1 comment

Comments

@SharonJin422
Copy link

2021-07-29 10:45:49,016 root INFO step_time: 0.138798, loss: 3.648251, step perplexity: 38.407426
2021-07-29 10:45:49,174 root INFO 0.000000 out of 614 correct
2021-07-29 10:45:49,315 root INFO step_time: 0.133353, loss: 3.665064, step perplexity: 39.058630
2021-07-29 10:45:49,397 root INFO 0.000000 out of 615 correct
2021-07-29 10:45:49,551 root INFO step_time: 0.148111, loss: 3.655409, step perplexity: 38.683334
2021-07-29 10:45:49,598 root INFO 0.000000 out of 616 correct
@SharonJin422 SharonJin422 changed the title training and testing as README introduced, but got bad accuracy on provided evaluation dataset. What may cause that? training and testing as README introduced, but got a bad accuracy on provided evaluation dataset. What may cause that? Jul 29, 2021
@itsbvk
Copy link

itsbvk commented Aug 8, 2022

may be overfitting?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@itsbvk @SharonJin422