Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

is CRO compatible with ORCID? #129

Open
cmungall opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 5 comments
Open

is CRO compatible with ORCID? #129

cmungall opened this issue Jun 9, 2021 · 5 comments

Comments

@cmungall
Copy link
Contributor

cmungall commented Jun 9, 2021

cc @elishawc - we would like to adopt CRO but it seems ORCID is only compatible with CREDIT?

https://info.orcid.org/credit-for-research-contribution/

are there recommendations for using CRO but having things be reflected correctly in ORCID? E.g is there a standard rollup table?

@elishawc
Copy link

Why CRO and not CrediT?

This is probably a Q for OSTI (ORCIDconsortium@osti.gov) or our ORCID representative (b.minihan@orcid.org).

@StroemPhi
Copy link

I thought CRO was incorporating CrediT. We would also like to adopt an ORCID compatible contributor ontology in TIB's ConfIDent project and as far as I can tell the VIVO comunity would do so as well.

@marijane
Copy link
Member

Our CrediT import is in https://github.com/data2health/contributor-role-ontology/blob/master/imports/credit_import.owl and is referenced in the built CRO files. Note that this is our OWL implementation of CrediT, as far as I know CASRAI has not published an RDF version of their own, but we try to use all their URLs.

@marijane
Copy link
Member

Our CrediT repo is at https://github.com/data2health/credit-ontology

@marijane
Copy link
Member

As for whether CRO is compatible with ORCiD, I do not know what that might involve. I suspect that's ORCiD's call, because it involves their API.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants