Skip to content

[Internal] Always write message for manual test integration #7

[Internal] Always write message for manual test integration

[Internal] Always write message for manual test integration #7

name: PR Comment
# WARNING:
# THIS WORKFLOW ALWAYS RUNS FOR EXTERNAL CONTRIBUTORS WITHOUT ANY APPROVAL.
# THIS WORKFLOW RUNS FROM MAIN BRANCH, NOT FROM THE PR BRANCH.
# DO NOT PULL THE PR OR EXECUTE ANY CODE FROM THE PR.
on:
pull_request_target:
types: [opened, reopened, synchronize]
branches:
- main
pull_request:
types: [opened, reopened, synchronize]
permissions:
contents: read
#Required for commenting on PRs
pull-requests: write
issues: write
jobs:
comment-on-pr:
runs-on: ubuntu-latest
permissions:
pull-requests: write
steps:
# NOTE: The following checks may not be accurate depending on Org or Repo settings.
- name: Check user and potential secret access
id: check-secrets-access
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
USER_LOGIN="${{ github.event.pull_request.user.login }}"
REPO_OWNER="${{ github.repository_owner }}"
REPO_NAME="${{ github.event.repository.name }}"
echo "Pull request opened by: $USER_LOGIN"
# Check if PR is from a fork
IS_FORK=$([[ "${{ github.event.pull_request.head.repo.full_name }}" != "${{ github.repository }}" ]] && echo "true" || echo "false")
HAS_ACCESS="false"
# Check user's permission level on the repository
USER_PERMISSION=$(gh api repos/$REPO_OWNER/$REPO_NAME/collaborators/$USER_LOGIN/permission --jq '.permission')
if [[ "$USER_PERMISSION" == "admin" || "$USER_PERMISSION" == "write" ]]; then
HAS_ACCESS="true"
elif [[ "$USER_PERMISSION" == "read" ]]; then
# For read access, we need to check if the user has been explicitly granted secret access
# This information is not directly available via API, so we'll make an assumption
# that read access does not imply secret access
HAS_ACCESS="false"
fi
# Check if repo owner is an organization
IS_ORG=$(gh api users/$REPO_OWNER --jq '.type == "Organization"')
if [[ "$IS_ORG" == "true" && "$HAS_ACCESS" == "false" ]]; then
# Check if user is a member of any team with write or admin access to the repo
TEAMS_WITH_ACCESS=$(gh api repos/$REPO_OWNER/$REPO_NAME/teams --jq '.[] | select(.permission == "push" or .permission == "admin") | .slug')
for team in $TEAMS_WITH_ACCESS; do
IS_TEAM_MEMBER=$(gh api orgs/$REPO_OWNER/teams/$team/memberships/$USER_LOGIN --silent && echo "true" || echo "false")
if [[ "$IS_TEAM_MEMBER" == "true" ]]; then
HAS_ACCESS="true"
break
fi
done
fi
# If it's a fork, set HAS_ACCESS to false regardless of other checks
if [[ "$IS_FORK" == "true" ]]; then
HAS_ACCESS="false"
fi
echo "has_secrets_access=$HAS_ACCESS" >> $GITHUB_OUTPUT
if [[ "$HAS_ACCESS" == "true" ]]; then
echo "User $USER_LOGIN likely has access to secrets"
else
echo "User $USER_LOGIN likely does not have access to secrets"
fi
- uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Delete old comments
if: steps.check-secrets-access.outputs.has_secrets_access != 'true'
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
run: |
# Delete previous comment if it exists
previous_comment_ids=$(gh api "repos/${{ github.repository }}/issues/${{ github.event.pull_request.number }}/comments" \
--jq '.[] | select(.body | startswith("<!-- INTEGRATION_TESTS -->")) | .id')
echo "Previous comment IDs: $previous_comment_ids"
# Iterate over each comment ID and delete the comment
if [ ! -z "$previous_comment_ids" ]; then
echo "$previous_comment_ids" | while read -r comment_id; do
echo "Deleting comment with ID: $comment_id"
gh api "repos/${{ github.repository }}/issues/comments/$comment_id" -X DELETE
done
fi
- name: Comment on PR
if: steps.check-secrets-access.outputs.has_secrets_access != 'true'
env:
GH_TOKEN: ${{ secrets.GITHUB_TOKEN }}
COMMIT_SHA: ${{ github.event.pull_request.head.sha }}
run: |
gh pr comment ${{ github.event.pull_request.number }} --body \
"<!-- INTEGRATION_TESTS -->
Run integration tests manually:
[go/deco-tests-run/sdk-java](https://go/deco-tests-run/sdk-java)
Inputs:
* PR number: ${{github.event.pull_request.number}}
* Commit SHA: \`${{ env.COMMIT_SHA }}\`
Checks will be approved automatically on success.
"