Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add tag prerequisite for building DL-Registry package #337

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Mar 20, 2024

Conversation

candleindark
Copy link
Collaborator

This PR adds the prerequisite of requiring tags from the the Datalad-Registry repository to build the DL-Registry package to README.md. It closes #334.

@candleindark candleindark added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Mar 16, 2024
@candleindark candleindark requested a review from yarikoptic March 16, 2024 05:19
Copy link

codecov bot commented Mar 16, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 98.68%. Comparing base (8a998bb) to head (cd2e10a).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master     #337   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   98.68%   98.68%           
=======================================
  Files          52       52           
  Lines        2518     2518           
=======================================
  Hits         2485     2485           
  Misses         33       33           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

of [the Datalad-Registry repository](https://github.com/datalad/datalad-registry), you
may need to
add [the Datalad-Registry repository](https://github.com/datalad/datalad-registry) as
a remote to your clone and fetch all the tags from it.)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

IMHO too many instances of the same [the Datalad-Registry repository] hyperlink - just making it too verbose etc. But I would not sweat over it now. Let's proceed.

Copy link
Collaborator Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Indeed so. Verbosity was one concern I had when putting up this PR. #340 corrects this problem.

@yarikoptic yarikoptic merged commit d36d8fb into datalad:master Mar 20, 2024
6 checks passed
@candleindark candleindark deleted the inform-tags branch March 20, 2024 20:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Handle the situation of installing the project without a tag
2 participants