Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add StreamUtils #5
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Add StreamUtils #5
Changes from 1 commit
5a33eca
3f126cc
9f8cd33
646bfa0
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
infact, the condition in this else if statement is not necessary. the bsv has implicit conditions, so if the prepareFifoB is empty, this
else if
branch will not be executed.but you write the condition here is good for code readability, you can keep the condition here, but this lead to another problem: this if statement has other possiblity that is not covered. you should add a
else
branch, and add some code there, maybe only some comment like "in all other condition, wait for stream B to be ready"There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, the condition here is not necessary but good for understanding. I have added a
else
branch where just waiting for streamB in this clock.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isStreamAEnd
is misleading.isStreamAEnd
looks likestreamA.isLast
, but infact it's not.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
isStreamAEnd
meansstreamA.isLast
, but it need to be reset when the whole concat ends, i.e.streamB.isLast
asserts. The codes here are misleading and I have modified for better understanding.