fix: mermaid complex types

[cobac]

Previously, from a complex nested type like a<b<c d, e f>>, the mermaid adapter would ignore a and capture b, c d and , e f.
Now it captures a and b<c d, e f>, which is discarded as far as I can see.

I've simplified the regex expression and tested with the obvious cases, but I'm not sure if the new regex might miss some edge cases. It'd be nice to add more tests if you think I might be missing something :)

I'm pushing twice, without the fix implemented and then with the fix, so that you can see the testing logs in both cases. well workflow needs approval anyway 😅

Thanks for your work!

Checklist

• I have read the contributing guide and understand what's expected of me
• I have run this code in development and it appears to resolve the stated issue
• This PR includes tests, or tests are not required/relevant for this PR
• I have opened an issue to add/update docs, or docs changes are not required/relevant for this PR

[datnguye]

Hi @cobac thanks for promptly fixing this!

Let me review and get back to you! But first sign, I think it does make sense with the changes when looking into the tests.
By the way, @syou6162 do you mind to collab with this PR in the meantime.

Thanks

[datnguye]

With the previous regex: (\w+)<(\w+\s+\w+(\s*,\s*\w+\s+\w+)*)>

Current proposal: (\w+)<.*>

Given that result, I think the previous regex is done to a specific type struct only, and this proposal is somewhat better if we try to stick to that "only get the root type".

Currently, I'm wondering if we can try to do more as follows:

• ARRAY<NotStruct> --> ARRAY_NotStruct
• ARRAY<STRUCT<...>> --> ARRAY_STRUCT[OMITTED]

Let me know what you think?
If not, and @syou6162 won't disagree by tmr, I shall release this to v1.15

Thanks

[cobac]

Thanks for the quick reply!

I have no particular opinions about how to represent the complex type in the diagram.

A release soon would be ideal since I'm trying to put this in production 😊 .

[datnguye]

v1.15.0 is now GA 🥳