Fixed hellaswag

lm_eval/tasks/hellaswag_ru/README.md

@@ -0,0 +1,49 @@
+# HellaSwag
+
+### Paper
+
+Title: `HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?`
+
+Abstract: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.07830
+
+Recent work by Zellers et al. (2018) introduced a new task of commonsense natural language inference: given an event description such as "A woman sits at a piano," a machine must select the most likely followup: "She sets her fingers on the keys." With the introduction of BERT, near human-level performance was reached. Does this mean that machines can perform human level commonsense inference?
+In this paper, we show that commonsense inference still proves difficult for even state-of-the-art models, by presenting HellaSwag, a new challenge dataset. Though its questions are trivial for humans (>95% accuracy), state-of-the-art models struggle (<48%). We achieve this via Adversarial Filtering (AF), a data collection paradigm wherein a series of discriminators iteratively select an adversarial set of machine-generated wrong answers. AF proves to be surprisingly robust. The key insight is to scale up the length and complexity of the dataset examples towards a critical 'Goldilocks' zone wherein generated text is ridiculous to humans, yet often misclassified by state-of-the-art models.
+Our construction of HellaSwag, and its resulting difficulty, sheds light on the inner workings of deep pretrained models. More broadly, it suggests a new path forward for NLP research, in which benchmarks co-evolve with the evolving state-of-the-art in an adversarial way, so as to present ever-harder challenges.
+
+Homepage: `https://rowanzellers.com/hellaswag/`
+
+
+### Citation
+
+```
+@inproceedings{zellers2019hellaswag,
+    title={HellaSwag: Can a Machine Really Finish Your Sentence?},
+    author={Zellers, Rowan and Holtzman, Ari and Bisk, Yonatan and Farhadi, Ali and Choi, Yejin},
+    booktitle ={Proceedings of the 57th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics},
+    year={2019}
+}
+```
+
+### Groups and Tasks
+
+#### Groups
+
+- Not part of a group yet
+
+#### Tasks
+
+- `hellaswag`
+
+
+### Checklist
+
+For adding novel benchmarks/datasets to the library:
+* [x] Is the task an existing benchmark in the literature?
+  * [x] Have you referenced the original paper that introduced the task?
+  * [x] If yes, does the original paper provide a reference implementation? If so, have you checked against the reference implementation and documented how to run such a test?
+
+
+If other tasks on this dataset are already supported:
+* [ ] Is the "Main" variant of this task clearly denoted?
+* [ ] Have you provided a short sentence in a README on what each new variant adds / evaluates?
+* [ ] Have you noted which, if any, published evaluation setups are matched by this variant?

lm_eval/tasks/hellaswag_ru/utils.py

@@ -0,0 +1,24 @@
+import datasets
+import re
+
+
+def preprocess(text):
+    text = text.strip()
+    # NOTE: Brackets are artifacts of the WikiHow dataset portion of HellaSwag.
+    text = text.replace(" [title]", ". ")
+    text = re.sub("\\[.*?\\]", "", text)
+    text = text.replace("  ", " ")
+    return text
+
+
+def process_docs(dataset: datasets.Dataset) -> datasets.Dataset:
+    def _process_doc(doc):
+        ctx = doc["ctx_a"] + " " + doc["ctx_b"].capitalize()
+        out_doc = {
+            "query": preprocess(doc["activity_label"] + ": " + ctx),
+            "choices": [preprocess(ending) for ending in doc["endings"]],
+            "gold": int(doc["label"]),
+        }
+        return out_doc
+
+    return dataset.map(_process_doc)