We read every piece of feedback, and take your input very seriously.
To see all available qualifiers, see our documentation.
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Hi, Could the MIT license information be added to the nuget information? it is good to add it so it will be shown in Visual Studio nuget management.
example:
<PropertyGroup> <PublishRepositoryUrl>true</PublishRepositoryUrl> <IncludeSymbols>true</IncludeSymbols> <SymbolPackageFormat>snupkg</SymbolPackageFormat> <ContinuousIntegrationBuild>true</ContinuousIntegrationBuild> <PackageLicenseExpression>MIT</PackageLicenseExpression> <RepositoryType>git</RepositoryType> <Nullable>enable</Nullable> <LangVersion>latest</LangVersion> </PropertyGroup>
Also some tools can create auto generated report like (dotnet-project-licenses) but right now those create missing entry:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm experiencing a déjà vu moment, aren't we doing this already?
https://github.com/moq/moq/blob/02b798af2295c4dfc54bc51cb92199d7c52ec3ff/src/Moq/Moq.csproj#L36
Sorry, something went wrong.
Interesting. The verion on nuget if from 7 months ago
while the commit is from 6 months ago:
Ah, you're right of course, thanks. I can't believe it's been that long since the last release. About time we published v.4.19.0.
No branches or pull requests
Hi,
Could the MIT license information be added to the nuget information?
it is good to add it so it will be shown in Visual Studio nuget management.
example:
Also some tools can create auto generated report like (dotnet-project-licenses) but right now those create missing entry:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: