Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add spec.revisionHistoryLimit config possibility for Deployment resource #116

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jul 9, 2023

Conversation

mhoyer
Copy link
Contributor

@mhoyer mhoyer commented Jul 3, 2023

Overview

Especially when using GitOps approach to deploy DexIdP it makes not real sense to keep revisions of the deployments as those are actually kind of persisted inside the underlying SCM, which drives the deployment and its history.

What this PR does / why we need it

It simply adds the possibility to configure the revisionHistoryLimit property of the Deployment resource template, but keeps the default to 10.

Checklist

  • Change log updated in Chart.yaml (see the contributing guide for details)
  • Chart version bumped in Chart.yaml (see the contributing guide for details)
  • Documentation regenerated by running make docs

@nabokihms
Copy link
Member

@mhoyer thanks for the PR. Could you please update the doc?

@mhoyer
Copy link
Contributor Author

mhoyer commented Jul 3, 2023

Ok. Got it. I forgot to run make docs again after I did the helm chart version bump.

Signed-off-by: Marcel Hoyer <mhoyer@pixelplastic.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hoyer <mhoyer@pixelplastic.de>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Hoyer <mhoyer@pixelplastic.de>
@mhoyer mhoyer force-pushed the add-revistion-history-limit-option branch from 71fab0f to 0139bd1 Compare July 9, 2023 07:43
Copy link
Member

@nabokihms nabokihms left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM, thanks! Great work, @mhoyer .

@nabokihms nabokihms merged commit a1d67ab into dexidp:master Jul 9, 2023
10 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants