Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Replace elastic by flow record #65

Merged
merged 6 commits into from
Nov 1, 2024
Merged

Conversation

janstarke
Copy link
Member

Description

This change removes direct support for elasticsearch and enables mactime2 to write the record flow format, which is understood by rdump (which has elasticsearch support).

Example

cargo run --bin mactime2 -- -b tests/data/mactime2/csv_test.bodyfile -F record | rdump

Next steps

The next steps would be to enable all other timelining tools to directly write the record flow format, which is much more flexible, so that further processing can be done using rdump, elasticsearch, or others

@janstarke janstarke added the enhancement New feature or request label Sep 25, 2024
Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 28, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 57.74%. Comparing base (6a02f2f) to head (64eb685).
Report is 7 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@             Coverage Diff             @@
##             main      #65       +/-   ##
===========================================
+ Coverage   34.21%   57.74%   +23.53%     
===========================================
  Files          36       14       -22     
  Lines        1140      568      -572     
===========================================
- Hits          390      328       -62     
+ Misses        750      240      -510     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@janstarke janstarke merged commit 1ef493a into main Nov 1, 2024
4 checks passed
@janstarke janstarke deleted the replace-elastic-by-flow-record branch November 1, 2024 09:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants