Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Submission 458, Chao et al.: Markdown Update #78

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Oct 22, 2024

Conversation

mtwente
Copy link
Contributor

@mtwente mtwente commented Oct 21, 2024

Pull request

Proposed changes

  • add extended abstract updates by authors
  • improve markdown formatting

Co-authored-by: Anne S. Chao mrsannechao@gmail.com
Co-authored-by: Yi Zhong yi.zhong@bcm.edu
Co-authored-by: Qiwei Li liqiwei2000@gmail.com
Co-authored-by: Zhandong Liu zhandonl@bcm.edu

Types of changes

  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality).
  • Enhancement (non-breaking change which enhances functionality)
  • Bug Fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue).
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change).

Checklist

  • I have read the README document.
  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I have mentioned all co-authors in the PR description as Co-authored-by: Name <email@domain.com>.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Expanded abstract clarifying research focus on Chen Duxiu's ideological evolution.
    • Enhanced methodology section with detailed subsections for analysis processes.
    • Updated author information format for clarity.
    • Revised results section comparing ChatGPT and LLaMA performance.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Corrected submission date to reflect the accurate timeline.
  • Documentation

    • Improved clarity and structure throughout the document.

mtwente and others added 3 commits October 21, 2024 15:45
Co-authored-by: Anne S. Chao <mrsannechao@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Yi Zhong <yi.zhong@bcm.edu>
Co-authored-by: Qiwei Li <liqiwei2000@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: <Zhandong Liu>
@mtwente mtwente requested a review from maehr October 21, 2024 14:02
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces significant modifications to the document titled "Efficacy of Chat GPT Correlations vs. Co-occurrence Networks in Deciphering Chinese History." Key updates include a restructured author information format, an expanded abstract detailing the research focus on Chen Duxiu, and an updated submission date. Additionally, the introduction and methodology sections were refined for clarity and depth, while the results section was enhanced to systematically compare the performance of ChatGPT and LLaMA. The conclusion was also revised to reflect insights on Chen Duxiu's ideological evolution and AI's limitations in historical analysis.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
submissions/458/index.qmd - Updated author information format to structured format.
- Expanded abstract detailing the research focus on Chen Duxiu.
- Updated submission date from "07-26-2024" to "09-12-2024."
- Refined introduction for clarity on Chen Duxiu's writings.
- Enhanced methodology section with new subsections and details on analysis processes.
- Updated results section to compare ChatGPT and LLaMA performance systematically.
- Revised conclusion to encapsulate insights on Chen Duxiu's ideological evolution and AI's limits.

Possibly related PRs

  • Submission 458, Chao et al. #31: This PR includes changes to the same document (submissions/458/index.qmd), specifically updating the author information format and expanding the abstract, which aligns with the changes made in the main PR.
  • Submission 440, Name Formatting #71: This PR modifies the author name format in a similar manner, changing it from a single line to a structured format, directly connecting to the changes in the main PR regarding author information.

Suggested labels

submission

Suggested reviewers

  • maehr

Poem

In the fields where knowledge grows,
A rabbit hops where wisdom flows.
With words refined and thoughts anew,
We celebrate the changes due.
Chen Duxiu's tale, now clearer told,
With AI's help, the past unfolds! 🐇✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 4

🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (6)
submissions/458/index.qmd (6)

45-45: Ensure consistent list formatting

There appears to be inconsistent indentation or numbering in the list of innovations. Verify that the numbering aligns correctly to render as an ordered list.

Apply this diff to adjust the formatting:

 1. the utilization of advanced AI methodologies grounded in extensive language models, as opposed to traditional statistical techniques that often relied on oversimplified assumptions, and
-2. an extension of our analysis to sentences rather than individual words, allowing for richer contextual understanding.
+2. an extension of our analysis to sentences rather than individual words, allowing for richer contextual understanding.

138-139: Clarify bullet point formatting in API Request section

Ensure that the bullet points under "API Request" are properly indented and formatted to render correctly.

Apply this diff to adjust the formatting:

 *    System Message: Provided context to the model, indicating that it was functioning as a helpful assistant.
 *    User Messages: Included the embedded document content, followed by instructions for providing a score on a scale from -2 to 2 (where 2 indicates strong support for communism and -2 indicates strong support for capitalism) and a detailed explanation within 200 to 300 words.

Consider using a nested list if needed.


150-152: Clarify ambiguous pronouns to enhance readability

In the paragraph, the subject 'It' is ambiguous. Replace 'It' with 'ChatGPT-4' to clearly indicate who is making the conclusions.

Apply this diff to improve clarity:

 In his 1914 article, “Aiguo xin yu zijue xin” [Patriotism and self-awareness], Chen famously shocked his readers by concluding that a nation which did not care for its people should not expect support from its citizens, and that such a nation should be allowed to die. Lacking such context, ChatGPT-4 picked up on Chen’s description of an ideal nation but did not underscore the novelty of his perspective. It coded the article as -1 (mildly in support of communism). The article never mentioned communism, and at the same time, the command was to rate articles from -2 to 2.

Change 'It coded the article as' to 'ChatGPT-4 coded the article as'.


153-155: Specify the subject to avoid ambiguity

Again, replace 'It' with 'ChatGPT-4' to make it clear who concluded and stated the observations.

Apply this diff:

 In the 1915 article, “Fa lanxi ren yu jinshi wenming” [The French and contemporary civilization], Chen praised socialism and mentioned French socialists such as Henri de Saint-Simon, Gracchus Babeuf, and Charles Fourier. It concluded that Chen was in favor of socialism but not rejecting capitalism. It erroneously stated that socialism was the same as communism, which did not appear in the text.

Change to:

+ChatGPT-4 concluded that Chen was in favor of socialism but not rejecting capitalism. It erroneously stated that socialism was the same as communism, which did not appear in the text.

159-159: Improve grammatical structure for clarity

Consider adjusting the sentence to enhance readability.

Apply this diff:

-Historians often cited the conflicting tone of “Gei Xiliu de xin” [A letter to Xiliu], one of Chen’s last essays, as indicative of his ambivalence about communism.
+Historians have often cited the conflicting tone of “Gei Xiliu de xin” [A Letter to Xiliu], one of Chen’s last essays, as indicative of his ambivalence about communism.

This change improves the verb tense for better grammatical correctness.


166-166: Maintain consistent formatting for section headings

Ensure that the headings for sections like 'Conclusion' and 'Results' are formatted consistently, using the appropriate number of hash symbols for the heading level.

Verify and adjust if necessary.

📜 Review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 3565874 and 7c0436a.

⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (5)
  • submissions/458/images/NetWork_Vol1.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • submissions/458/images/embeding_KeyWord.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • submissions/458/images/flow_Chart_network.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • submissions/458/images/network_4and5.png is excluded by !**/*.png
  • submissions/458/images/text_summarization_sentiment.png is excluded by !**/*.png
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • submissions/458/index.qmd (3 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🔇 Additional comments (2)
submissions/458/index.qmd (2)

6-8: Verify author metadata formatting compliance

The updated author metadata now includes 'given' and 'family' fields under 'name'. Please ensure that this structure complies with the required syntax for author information in Quarto or the publication's guidelines.

If needed, I can help adjust the formatting to meet the guidelines.


142-142: ⚠️ Potential issue

Standardize the naming of GPT-4 and ChatGPT-4

Ensure consistent usage of 'GPT-4' and 'ChatGPT-4' throughout the document to maintain professionalism and clarity.

Example correction:

-In summary, our method leveraged the GPT-4 API to analyze and classify political opinions in text documents.
+In summary, our method leveraged the ChatGPT-4 API to analyze and classify political opinions in text documents.

Review all instances to ensure consistency.

Likely invalid or redundant comment.

submissions/458/index.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
submissions/458/index.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
submissions/458/index.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
submissions/458/index.qmd Show resolved Hide resolved
@maehr maehr merged commit 1278bd5 into digihistch24:main Oct 22, 2024
3 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants